iran & america
2007-02-12 22:43:19 · 10 answers · asked by hoda k 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Nuclear energy is the energy source of the future, like it or not. It is cheaper and safer than almost any other energy source.
Bush is concerned about the type reactors Iran is using. They can be used for making bomb grade materials. His concern is understandable from some aspects because they are not the safest or cheapest type reactor to build so you have to wonder why they choose to build them. There may be other factors involved in the decision besides weapons though.
My issue is the presumed guilt associated with the reactors. Bush and the rest the world assumes Iran has weapon building plans and they might. However it isn't the US or anyone else's place to tell others what they can or cannot do within their own borders. It isn't just the US worried about Iran and nuclear energy. It is a lot of the world. There are some valid concerns there but the problem should be resolved through negotiations rather than brute force.
On the other side of it, any country that even threatens to use a nuclear weapon on another country should be removed from the map. I don't care who it is, nuclear weapons should not be used ever and are a huge waste of money.
2007-02-12 22:58:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the issue is more about Iran dumping US Dollar reserves and their disdain for what they view as Zionist oppression of the Palastinians than nuclear power.
If not for these things, we would be getting along with Iran fine as they have made many policy movements toward westernization recently.
2007-02-12 22:53:00 · answer #2 · answered by zzycatch 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It really wouldnt matter if Iran were able to build a nuclear weapon if they didnt have the guts to use it. I genuinely believe that these people are being incited by members within their leadership to feel like this is the only justifiable action to take.
2007-02-12 22:52:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely, via fact the Iranian president mentioned he will improve nukes and easily use them to wipe the jewish human beings from the face of the earth. And wager what, he mentioned we would be next! so some distance as Saddam Hussein and WMD's. What relating to the hundreds of Curds that he mustard gassed interior the previous due 80's and early ninety's. final I heard mustard gas bombs are a WMD. We purely gave the guy a ten 3 hundred and sixty 5 days head start to conceal or get rid of any WMD's he would have had. undesirable intelligence would not make a guy a liar, he basically desires to fireside the idiots that did no longer do their homework so they do no longer make him appear as if an fool returned.
2016-11-03 08:10:36 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Iran feels it is under threat by the Americans then they should go ahead and if America feels they are under threat then they should attack Iran. common sense for Americans
2007-02-12 23:20:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
bush needs to rot in hell and iran needs to chillout and stop there crazynest and n/e is good when used right.
2007-02-12 22:51:49 · answer #6 · answered by ♥lois c♥ ☺♥♥♥☺ 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Think of Charles Manson have a nuclear bomb...
2007-02-12 23:39:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If it was possible to fake a nuclear accident, I would do it now.
2007-02-12 22:47:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wait & Look
2007-02-12 22:51:59 · answer #9 · answered by Liaquat A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all r explosive in nature
2007-02-12 22:46:17 · answer #10 · answered by star 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋