Do you think that grays anatomy switches the conventional roles of women and men?

Question

Do you think that the show objectifies men and makes women seem like the stronger characters?

Answer 1

Interesting.

As I sit here thinking about it I think that all the time I am watching the show i am only interested in the women and not because they are strong characters, but; I can see how one might miss the point of the chacter development in this show and say that the men are being objectified but they are not.

The show is about the duality of life as a doctor/woman, the balancing of presonal issues and professional issues.

If you paid attnetion to the second to the last episode Meredith was being criticized for letting a man lead her astray, while Christine was fearing the same thing. Izzie nearly tanked her career over Denny and Callie is regretting her hasty decision to marry a surgical intern thus jeopardizing her chances to be chief resident. And who could forget Bailey's break down when she thought her husband was not going to be there for their child and George came to her rescue to pull her through this.

No, the men in this show are not being belittle or objectified. Admittedly, as Addison put it they are "eye candy", but they are used to the same extent as the female characters. Meredith is to Derek as Addison is to Alex, Callie is to George and Christina is to Preston. They are all women/doctors trying to have a love life and a career. As for the men they are men/ doctors looking to have a rareer and a love life as well.

Mark helps you to realize that it is all about sex. He is always putting the moves on women. Alex used to. The whole Syphillis epidemic tells you they are all sleeping around. Izzie has here monster and does George. Meredith and Addison get drunk and screw.

I think it is plain to see that no one is safe from the writer having them show their emotions.

The show used to start out with surgical scenes and red shoes and red underwear. That was the balance between a love life and a career. Nothing has changed but the intro.

Answer 2

I think the switch the conventional roles of women and men, but not by objectifying men and making women the stronger characters. Personally I just think some of the roles are reversed in the way that Bailey is generally the detached, unemotional doctor, when usually that would be a man's role. George's wife (I forget her name), is his boss, and usually it would be vice versa on a TV show.

Answer 3

To a certain extent maybe it does. But the producer is a woman so maybe she wanted to show that its time that women played stronger roles. But the male characters are equally as strong, Burke and McDreamy aren't wishy washy characters.

But having said that recently the female characters aren't being portrayed in a strong light, both Christina and Izzy their characters seems to be fading a little and I think that the producers need to change the story lines so that they get their strength back

Answer 4

i think of your generalizing your observations. that's decrease than no circumstances how all women persons and men act. i do no longer think of that the gender rolls have replaced as plenty simply by fact the rolls have long gone extinct. the worldwide is purely turning out to be extra open to women persons being sexually aggressive, and men passive. they do no longer seem to be taking the masculine place, that is purely extra women persons have become self sufficient and the social norm has replaced. all people sits around whining and bitching related to the different intercourse, that is what we do.

Answer 5

Burke and McDreamy acts like the best doctor the Hospital can offer. Nope it just shows that whatever the men can do the women can equal to it.

Answer 6

No.