2007-02-12 18:22:22 · 15 answers · asked by john s 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
She has jumped ahead in the do nothing campaign. The so called 5 day work week ended up with her taking long trips, naturally at taxpayers expense and tying up congress in nonbinding meaningless resolution activity. The time could have been used to get something done but since that is not her nature we will witness a week of congress members blabbing about their feelings on the president. The people's feelings is what matters. Congress is supposed to be productive not ineffective as has been the case since Pelosi took office. She needs to understand the President is down the street, not in her seat.
2007-02-13 01:49:25 · answer #1 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Nancy got there fairly and squarely. The only people who should or can remove her are the ones who put her there in the first place. I am a arch conservative, but I believe firmly that we have a system with rules and laws and they should be followed. I do not care much for Mdme Pelosi or her politics, but only the voters and the congress persons who put her in her position have and should have the power to remove her.
2007-02-12 19:01:15 · answer #2 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The Logan act hasn't been enforced in over 2 hundred years. there have been would situations the position contributors of congress met with leaders of overseas governments and the govtdepartment chosen no longer to pursue enforcement of the Logan act. There has also been debate over the years as to if or no longer congress is roofed through the act. If the Bush administration were to target to implement it with Pelosi it may well be seen wisely as being a one hundred% political decision, exceptionally if prices were no longer delivered hostile to the republicans who went to Syria and meet with Assad some days in the previous Pelosi.
2016-12-04 03:00:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, she shouldn't be "removed" from office. In the month and a half that she has been Speaker, look whats happened....
The minimum wage scandal in the American Samoa Island,
The fact that her husband owns large numbers of stock in the company involved with the tuna company there.
Now the big stink about the aircraft.
Let her do what most Dems/Libs do so well....let their mouths hang themselves.
2007-02-12 21:24:07 · answer #4 · answered by jonn449 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
For what reason? Standing up to the neo con bunch? Getting the perks that the Pubs gave themselves? Get real. You are just a hater that wishes a woman did not have the job
2007-02-12 23:25:31 · answer #5 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I do not think she should be. I disagree with almost everything that comes out of her mouth, but she got where she is the right way. You cannot take someone down just for having strong opinions....As much as I cannot stand the women.
2007-02-12 18:48:58 · answer #6 · answered by TCSO 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
For what? For doing her job? She is and will continue to be a terrific Speaker of the House. She's not afraid of the Bush Machine and that must be burning the butts of more than a few Republicans, but to most of us that means she's doing the job we need her to do.
2007-02-12 18:31:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
For what exactly? Finally putting the neocons in place? We shouldn't remove her, we should crown her!!
*sigh* Why do I even waste my time answering obviously stupid questions like this...when will I learn?!
2007-02-12 18:31:59 · answer #8 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Yes.
2007-02-12 18:26:30 · answer #9 · answered by PD 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nancy is a god and should be made President. Once we impeach Bushcheney she will rule!
2007-02-12 18:28:11 · answer #10 · answered by San Diego Art Nut 6 · 4⤊ 5⤋