Has it failed in producing thinkers? No
Does it fail in promoting thinking? Quite often
Many great thinkers are produced despite the school system, not necessarily because of it.
However - school does provide the skills that thinkers need.
Someone who is a great thinker - but lack the skills to communicate their ideas or to understand what others have thought or currently think, might as well not be a thinker at all.
And many within the system try to promote thinking although the system isn't really designed for it.
2007-02-12 15:30:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by apbanpos 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not so certain that producing "thinkers" is necessarily the role of the public schools. I think that our schools are actually charged with the task of producing "citizens for the republic". Not everybody needs to be Socrates... after all... who would pick up the trash on Wednesday morning if we were all genuises?
But, beyond that, I would suggest that our school system does produce a fair number of "thinkers". America produces more than her share of highly educated people. The great majority of the graduates of America's colleges this spring will be products of the public schools.
I think that idea that our schools are failing is one of the great myths of our time. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that we have set our goals (100% success) so high.
2007-02-12 15:31:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by apothegm1066 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The schools aren't good at, and have never been good at, producing thinkers. Parents produce thinkers, schools produce literates which is a huge plus to a society. Illiterates tend to have a lot more children who are poor and are likely to be liabilities to society.
2007-02-12 15:27:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Michael da Man 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
i'm getting the feeling that the school equipment has over the years grow to be so bureaucratic in its operation that the conventional objectives of the corporate get shuffled round and there are huge numbers of youngsters that fall through the cracks. It boggles the suggestions to stroll right into a keep and characteristic a teenager on the sign up who can not make substitute. they ought to trust in the readout on the device or giving substitute eludes them. If the bill is composed of four.15 and also you supply them 5.25, you would assume them to conceptualize the problem and basically furnish you with again the dollar and dime. lots of the time, they do no longer understand. I also experience the school equipment would not stress a lot more beneficial the easy guidelines all of us ought to stay through out in the actual international. maximum don't understand the thanks to funds, take care of a monetary company account, stability a checkbook, or purchase interior of their means. i imagine the school structures efforts are incorrect in training youngsters basically the thanks to stay. There are thinkers popping out in the international, yet without an effective beginning to paintings from, it basically leads to their efforts directed in the incorrect route, which ultimately means failure.
2016-12-04 02:54:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Our society wants to be constantly entertained -- between TV and computers all the thinking is done for us. We are fed information by these means from such an early age now that we have become "media dependent non-thinkers."
Try teaching students -- better yet, try to get them to read their texts. I can't imagine why they waste their money on textbooks -- they certainly don't get read. Students want their knowledge delivered via power point, thank you -- with every aspect and nuance spelled out completely. It is VERY frustrating.
2007-02-12 15:45:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by chequamegon 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sadly, it's true. Critical thinking is not encouraged in schools in this country, and I STRONGLY suspect it's because most teachers are not intellectually equiped to answer many of the tough questions that would come their way if their students did. And people who accept knoledge without question- will march to whatever tune is played loudest...
2007-02-12 15:35:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Joseph, II 7
·
0⤊
0⤋