My friend is trying to tell me that Ben wallce is more valueable than Kevin Garnett to his team does anybody have a stat where i can show him he is wrong. Becausae i know he is but i need a stat to prove it
2007-02-12 14:42:25 · 12 answers · asked by cowboys8194 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
WOW pick any category
KG is the # 2 player in fantasy sports right now which is based on all categories not to mention that all Ben Wallace ever did was rebound and block shots he now only gets about half the boards he did and not nearly as many blocks
fg ft 3pt pts rbs ast st blk to
.476 .835 7 1125 625 226 67 88 134
that's KG ranked at #2
Ben Wallace
.442 .408 1 306 501 100 73 103 65
ranked #82 barely has him in blks and is dwarfed by kg in every other category. Wallace cant hit a free throw to save his life yeah that's real valuable heck shaq has a better free throw % than Ben
its not even a ? if he argued about it more i would just let him be cause its not nice to pick on a mentally challenged individual
2007-02-12 15:14:28 · answer #1 · answered by theTRUTH 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The idea the Wallace is more valuable than KG is insane. KG can rebound and defend just as well as Wallace (check the stats) and KG has an amazing offensive game that extends out to the 3-point line. Wallace is good from 4 feet and in, if that.
2007-02-12 19:23:03 · answer #2 · answered by lupin_1375 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
stats doesn't always mean everything on who is the better player to have on your team, but KG is definately better than Ben Wallace cause Wallace dominates Defense, but makes even less % of his FT's than Shaq does, even my mom could make more % of FT's than him, and he doesn't know at all how to pass, dribble or even shoot the ball, and the 1 thing he's tremendous at which is defense, KG does just as good all around in every single defensive stat, they both usually average like 10-12 RPG, and 2-3 BPG, Ben gets more steals by maybe 1 more SPG then KG, but hands down KG is better all around then Ben is, only reason he was good in Detroit and a leader, is cause he played the longest here outta all the players on the team when he was here, and fit in perfect with the rest of the starting 5 which took the heat off of him, and since they had 4 good solid scorers to give him less work to do on offense
2007-02-12 16:45:29 · answer #3 · answered by Bo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kevin Garnett is way more valuable, because he averages a lot more points than Ben Wallace. He is equally good at defense, even Ben Wallace has won straight Defensive Player of the Year awards.
2007-02-12 14:53:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This shouldnt even be a question! KG is one of the top 5 players in the leagues while Wallace is totally one dimentional.Great defender but no offense of threat at all. KG can do it all. He has done a lot with no help from the lousy T-wolves organization. Hell he has played point gaurd many times during his time with the wolves also.
2007-02-12 14:50:54 · answer #5 · answered by danno 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very- the take care of Minnesota is one that could ensue yet i think of would could contain Chicago's quantity 2 %. besides as Luol Deng and Tyson Chandler- i do no longer see Ben Wallace coming to Chicago- definitely no longer in the event that they sign Garnett. i think of you will see huge Ben return to Detroit
2016-10-02 01:24:49 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You need more intelligent friends, KG would dominate Wallace any day. KG leads the league in triple doubles (I believe) and also in double double this year. KG averages 22.5 points, 12.5 rebounds, and 4.5 assists while Wallace averages 6.2 points, 10.2 rebounds, and 2.0 assists. It's a clear choice I would rather have KG on my team
2007-02-12 14:54:48 · answer #7 · answered by Matt D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
here's your 'value' stat, in the most literal, direct way possible:
KG - Minnesota drafted him from high school and has kept him ever since, even though it hasn't been cheap. They signed him at $4.6M for 3 years, then offered him $121M for a 6 year extension (the NBA record for a single contract), and then offered $100M for yet another 5 years.
Wallace - just traded away by the Pistons, and was signed by the Bulls at a measly $60M for 4 years.
2007-02-12 15:48:59 · answer #8 · answered by will 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh wow what an idiot:
KG: 22.5 ppg, 12.5 rbg, 4.5apg, 1.3spg, 1.8bpg, 47.6fg%, 83.5ft%BEN: 6.2 ppg, 10.2 rbg, 2.0 apg, 1.5 spg, 2.1bpg, 44.2fg%, 40.8ft%...
KG is a top 5 fantasy player. Ben beats kg by a tad in blks and stls while kg wins everything else hands down!! LOL
2007-02-12 14:52:54 · answer #9 · answered by Alex S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ben Wallace is better!
He brings a strong presence to the floor! He can play defense, rebound and set up and score if he needs to!
2007-02-12 15:39:33 · answer #10 · answered by traderb550 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋