i would say its fairly even but i would keep collison and kidd, because kidd is flirting with a triple double every single game with pretty decent defensive numbers, and not many turnovers for a pg. as for collison, he is a solid big man for your team, almost getting a double double a game.
duncan is old and injury prone
and jack is a middle of the road pg
id say keep your players
2007-02-12 13:49:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Zach 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think you should do this trade mainly because Kidd's future is uncertain and the values are skewed. Collison gives you a good game every month and isnt consistent enough to give a good fantasy boost. Kidd's FG% and points are random and never constant. Duncan and Jack can give you similar numbers everynight and are more reliable.
try this site for trades http://basketballmonster.com/tradeanalysis.aspx?ds=9
2007-02-12 23:39:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by william s 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, u should definitely accept. nick collison can't stay hot for much longer, and jason kidd is getting old/weak, plus he is in the middle of lawsuits. jarrett jack is starting to pick up his assists, and duncan is producing every day. however, if u need more rebounds, stick with your players.
2007-02-12 21:49:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Don't do it. Jack isn't really performing with the surging Brandon Roy. Roy is too good so Jack wouldn't really pick it up. Plus Sergio is also doing decent.
Jason Kidd has been a monster in fantasy league. Tim Duncan although has great stats, kills your FT%. I really really hate bad FT shooters and Tim Duncan is one of them. Winning FTs isn't hard, but it does require a whole team of good FT shooters. With the way Duncan plays, he shoots too many of them.
My advice, keep your Kidd.
2007-02-12 23:02:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Edwin L 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, don't do it. While Duncan is way better than collison, sollison hs only had 2 games without double digits i either rebounds or points since january 6th!, and Duncan has his Plantar fasciitis problems too. Then, Kidd is WAYYYYYYYY better than Jack. If you want to do this trade, I advise asking thie other guy for a better PG than Jack, or, if he has one, a player like Chris Bosh, or Jermaine O'Neal instead of Duncan
2007-02-13 06:44:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by yahskaraghu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think it is a good deal myself..i just moved collison in a league i am in and got tyson chandler in exchange...jack's stock willl continue to rise i believe since he is just a 2nd yr player so he has upside still..TD is a double double and a block machine so i believe u are getting the better of the deal...you don't say however where u are in the standings nor what stats u are trying to improve on but i believe this is a trade that works for u...good luck anyway...
2007-02-13 14:31:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by bowmanultra2004 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Overall its good because Collison is going to get less time because of Lewis. Kidd is getting dizzy in trade rumors. Tim is Mr. Consistency, Jarret is alright.
2007-02-13 00:03:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by notgnirracnwahsar 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here is the deal: you win pts by about 9, give up a couple boards, just 0.5 ast, just 0.3 steals, gain 1.3 blks, gain 3% in fg lose 2% in ft%...
SO: its a close deal and needs based. I like your side on paper because Im unsure whats going to happen with collison and blks are hard to get. I would do it!
2007-02-12 22:42:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Alex S 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Absolutely! Kidd is hurt and Collison isn't very good. Duncan is awesome and Jack isn't bad! This will turn the league around if you do it!
2007-02-16 11:33:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by mikeNikes 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, Duncan and Jarrett have lots of blocks and rebounds. duncan also has a lot of points each game.
2007-02-12 23:23:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋