what do you think?
2007-02-12 13:13:03 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
united-peace I like the way you think. This thing has got me intreagued as much as the OJ stuff from 11 years ago. And I am not a celebrity watcher at all. This stuff is wonderful to follow. Got Larry King on now.
2007-02-12 13:56:52 · update #1
heavy haul dad I like your response as well. to those of you who say this could not happen- why not? She was one weird lady.
2007-02-12 13:58:34 · update #2
Slick you may be right and I have no proof but I do not think Daniel K Stern is the father he does not want a DNA test. This woman was a nympho and had lots of sex with different men.
2007-02-12 14:00:26 · update #3
Lisa B, I like your passion but this woman was a hillbilly and why did she and her son commit suicide? Incest is what I think. Drugs drugs drugs and incest equals incest.... look it up.
2007-02-12 15:50:06 · update #4
But you are correct Stern is a bad character- no doubt about that.
2007-02-12 15:51:07 · update #5
Why would any one believe that nonsense. She was messed up not retarded. Good lord. Although if you looked at her hillbilly assed mom you might think otherwise.
2007-02-12 13:25:09 · answer #1 · answered by heavyhauldad 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's gossip for the gossip hunters! However,Nicole's best friend for 17 years and god-mother to her baby has said that Nicole had personally told her Larry Birkhead's the father. She also accused Howard Stern as probably the cause of Daniel and Nicole's deaths. It's scary that the Sterne Family has kidnapped the baby! What kind of man is Sterne? He prefers to hide Nicole's baby as a fugitive and to live life on her estate. It seems that he was only getting income from 'taking care' of Nicole, and serves no more than a home-maker and errand-handler to Nicole. Could he have snuffed off Daniel and Nicole to take over her money because Nicole had been appearing at Larry King Show to denounce any love relationship with him? And when the baby was born, why didn't the lovey-dovey pictures of Nicole, Daniel and the baby do not have Howard Sterne included in them... especially when he claims to be the father. Wonder whether Sterne, and Ron Rale, Sterne's friend who is also a lawyer, conspirators with plans to steal her Estate Assets?
It's amazing that Howard's friends claim that Nicole loved Howard when Nicole had appeared on Larry King's shows to denouce that they had a love relationship! Wonder whether Nicole was being drugged and forced to make a will? She really didn't appear to be the sort to think that she'd die soon. She was happy with her relationship with daniel, and after that was excited she was going to have a baby. It's weird that she should ever did think of making a will.
One correspondent points out that Sterne is chasing blood money. His question was: Why is Howard Sterne letting camera people and media crowding around him with permission to publish his story when he is supposed to be mourning Nicole's death? Also, when Nicole tried to contact her mother after Daniel's death, Sterne made her slam off the phone.
The Court should order Sterne to immediately surrender the baby in case Sterne should harm her.
2007-02-12 13:37:52 · answer #2 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
HE ISN'T the baby father!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's the jackass Howard K. Stern! And I believe Howard K. Stern is the killer of Anna & Daniel!!! And what proof of the "speculation" of the tabloid DO YOU HAVE?
2007-02-12 13:40:48 · answer #3 · answered by Slick 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, wow. I by no potential knew they slept at the same time. That blows me away. that would desire to be achieveable via fact why the super put off in doing the paternity try. Holy sh*t! i'm incredibly involved now!
2016-11-03 07:18:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hello no. As a single mom with a son who's as tall as a grown man and 12 years old...he is my one and only true love and the only one I can trust to keep my deep dark secrets just that....what happens in our house, stay's in our house and is no one's business. Daniel was her true mamma's boy, a good boy, a good straight-A student in school, he wasn't a night-owl-club-hopping idiot in the tabloids either. See I too grew up in a completely dysfunctional family, and while growing up seeing my dad losing his self-respect with drug abuse, I too was forced to see what I would never become and I saw my younger teenage version of myself in Daniel, he was the opposite of his mother but I'm sure you all know that no matter who your mother is or what she's done, you love your mother, the only parent you've ever known, the only one who tells you everyday, how much she loves you, she babied Daniel and as he grew up to be a man, he became a threat to Howard. Daniel was at that age where he didn't have to do what this guy, this lawyer who thinks he's somebody couldn't tell him what to do anymore, he was a grown young adult man and was becoming very observant/suspicious of his mom's surroundings and probably noticed that Howard was trying to control her and he probably thought he had the situation under control. But how can you challenge someone that already has his plans in order. When Howard killed Daniel, Anna was left with only one person to trust and probably didn't want to but with being kept drugged up all the time by Howard, he was able to influence her fears, brainwahing her and keeping her vulnerable. It's pretty simple really, he knew what she was afraid of most, people coming to take her baby away, taking her money, leaving her penniless and the fact that her mother didn't love her.....puhleeze. Everyone know's that no matter what...blood is thicker than water. Ever notice that she'd only bash her mom when she was completely incoherent? And since he was closest to her and saw that she was in pain, mentally, physically, whatever...why didn't he get her help? Why not get her to see a Doctor? And if she didn't want to see a Doctor, why not an intervention? I mean come on people....He's a lawyer for Christ's sake, he's not stupid, he's a smart guy with a pretty sharp brain, any smart person who claims to have lost the love of his life would have done everything and anything to keep her safe but instead, he sat by, very close by and let her appear incoherent on tv with slurred speech and we're supposed to believe that was her grief talking? It just seems like he's trying to cover his tracks by letting her appear to everyone that way and his reply would be, "you saw for yourselves, she just couldn't do it anymore, she had enough" and the evidence is right there, courtesy of Entertainment tonight. In the latest videos, she just seemed to be grieving but accepting and moving on. I believe he was the one providing the prescription pills, he's the one responsible....I mean did you see his fake tears on ET tonight? He didn't make eye contact, he's not a very good actor. I really liked her, so who cares about the money, Mr. Marshall loved her unconditionally, he never judged her and then he died and she was left alone without the affection she was so adorned with by Mr. Marshall. No other man has filled Mr. Marshall's shoes and she does deserve what he told her was rightfully her's for giving him the best last years of his life. Howard K. Stern knew this and he took complete advantage of her, her son, her daughter and her extended family. He's wrong for withholding Dannielynn, he knows that's all he has left to just hang in there by a thread. I pray that Dannielynn's closest guardian angels bring her home to grandma...where she belongs. If they don't.....like them, when Howard had no care for they're lives, why would he care about Dannielynn's life? If he goes down, he can take her down with him. Someone needs to step in on behalf of Anna's mother and find some loophole to remove the child from Howard's grip and she needs to be placed somewhere, even if temporarily not with grandma-just until things are resolved.
2007-02-12 15:33:08 · answer #5 · answered by Lisa B 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You must be joking. The thought of incest never entered my mind. But I guess that's why it's my mind & not yours
2007-02-12 16:53:10 · answer #6 · answered by Sandi Beach 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Are there any remaining questions as to how this country (U.S.) got in to the state it is in today as to witness the coverage and interest the death of this bimbo has unleashed? Folks, we got serious problems out here to solve. We got good people dying in a trumped-up war. We got a madman in the White House.
And five days after the death of this bimbette, her demise still leads the news. Don't wonder how we got to the state....
2007-02-12 13:23:57 · answer #7 · answered by conx-the-dots 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I think all the speculations are nothing but cap.
2007-02-12 13:19:49 · answer #8 · answered by evildragon1952 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is supisous, that , Stern, was , around both times, of death?!?!?!?!?! u???? As far as the son , being , daddy, nahhh!!! She wasn't that sick, was, she??!!!
2007-02-12 13:21:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let her rest in peace
2007-02-12 14:07:34 · answer #10 · answered by Grand pa 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋