2007-02-12 13:10:39 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, Its not what he stole, Its what he altered, The theft was just
subterfuge, He altered files , so that it would be possible, for
Hillary to run. Clinton's involvement in Somalia, would have exposed the inability to deal with the Terrorist threat.
2007-02-12 13:21:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
the respond is the comparable as a results of fact the final time you asked it. First the information have been very own no longer secret. next he got rid of copies of the information no longer the unique. i'm undecided you have ever been to a countrywide Archive or understand the ideas of learn. A CRS assistant is assigned to you they acquire information sign a team of custody then return them. the guy can no longer replica something the learn assistant does each and every of the copying. So something is suspicious approximately this yet is isn't a international changing adventure. enable's circulate directly to those 15 billion funds that cannot be accounted for. circulate huge purple circulate
2016-12-17 15:14:54 · answer #2 · answered by licht 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO
Its a Democrat thing so it is swept under the rug.
I believe the papers were something to cover up for Clinton.
He has a lot to hid including his neglect in preventing 9/11
2007-02-12 13:14:26 · answer #3 · answered by sapphire_630 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Now that is a great question. The whole episode turns my stomach. Corruption, corruption and corruption. More was made of the Mark Foley thing in the news. How sad.
2007-02-12 13:15:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's called a free pass.
2007-02-12 13:19:03 · answer #5 · answered by tabs 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Probably not politicians have a way of covering up there messes
2007-02-12 13:17:46 · answer #6 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No- he's protected by the crooks at the justice dept.
2007-02-12 13:13:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Probably not. Why is he not in jail?
2007-02-12 13:18:36 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is very very old news. Nobody is interested in your conspiracy theory's.
2007-02-12 13:21:40 · answer #9 · answered by itsdabigbadwolf 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋