Liberal and Liberal-disguised-as-a-moderate.
They both (all) believe that a capitalistic nation is inherantly unfair and that only a socialistic nation will benefit all. They believe that the USSR was a failed experiment and that, given the chance, they would do it right!
They believe that if we leave the rest of the world alone, they won't bother us. They believe that if we leave the Middle East, everything will suddenly smooth out and life will be good and the world will be totally at peace.
They believe that environmental concerns are our chief issue. They fear global warming, and won't be happy until we have given up our dependency on fuel-burning vehicles and go back to bicycles.
Of course I disagree with all of this...what American who enjoys freedom and has common sense doesn't?
2007-02-12 12:51:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by wise_ole_sage 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Obama seems to be a fairly decent fellow as far as liberal politicians go, but that might just because we haven't had an opportunity to really see him in action.
Clinton is an unindicted criminal. She was party to stealing $28,000 worth of furniture from the White House when she left. Her brother worked out the details with her husband to sell pardons right before leaving office. She is a lawyer (remember 2 for 1?) and you can't expect her to have NOT known. Much the same way that she pled ignorance on all of the Whitewater fraud in Arkansas. She illegally received White House personnel files on Republicans that had already left the W.H. Hillary is a slimy crook.
2007-02-12 20:55:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by plezurgui 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Obama weak Clinton evil
2007-02-12 20:50:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
1 lacks experience & accomplishments. The other lacks morals. Both would be bad for the country.
2007-02-12 20:52:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
Bad I think. Though it could be good, kinda like a double negative and they cancel each other out.
2007-02-12 20:52:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Both bad, it's the evil of to lessers.
2007-02-12 20:50:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Yo it's Me 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
well bill would have a better chance at the seat,than Hillary,and obama is a flaming liberal..well spoken and upbeat...decider
2007-02-12 20:53:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hillary is a socialist, no I don't agree with that, Bama is a terrorist sympathizer an no I don't agree with that.
2007-02-12 20:53:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
ugly, both of them. On the inside and out.
2007-02-12 20:51:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Josh 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I am worried that America is not ready for that.
Past performance is no guarantee of future profits. It is hard to say. The people want someone real and honest that is not afraid to fight on the front lines. We don't want someone like Bush or Cheney who are cowards and liars, kidnappers, torturers and killers.
2007-02-12 20:53:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Stop_the_Klan@yahoo.com 2
·
1⤊
5⤋