Even though he won't be running.
2007-02-12 12:40:25 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i.e. the democrat campaign will still be anti-bush even though he won't be running.
2007-02-12 12:43:56 · update #1
ducky: don't kid yourself, the democratic victories in 06' were votes against Bush, not the party. The freshman democrats were almost all right wing democrats.
2007-02-12 12:45:06 · update #2
I for one, will be voting against Bush for a long time to come.
It will take that long for my anger to subside.
2007-02-12 12:49:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's more about Amercans voting against Republicans.
The Bush Administration had changed the image and direction of the Republican party and with the full support of the Republican Congress. 2008 will be a vote against the damage that has been done to America.
Since the Republicans have supported almost everything Bush has done, 2006 was about them just as much as it was about Bush.
The campaign will not be anti-Bush. That rhetoric will be on the back burner. Those sentiments are already there and they will have an effect. They will have to attack and discredit the Republican candidate just like the Republicans will do to Hillary.
BTW, - With the number of Clinton supporters and all the other Democratic candidates splitting up the rest of the primary vote, Hillary will almost defnitely win the primary.
Not that I am a supporter of her, but that's the way it is.
Bush
Clinton
Bush
Clinton
I wonder if Jeb will run in 2016?
2007-02-12 12:43:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Fo sho!! It'd be stupid not to. Dems had to go through it with Clinton too.. The whole scandal thing was all over.. It's part of politics, I'm betting that whoever the republican candidate is will have the problem of supporting Bush a little too much and dems will be all over it. Just like the reps are already going after Obamas voting record, of course they won't tell you why he voted the way he did, never a mention about all the scandalous attachments included in these bills but you know, whatever..
2007-02-12 12:48:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I'll be voting AGAINST the Bush policies in 2008. If that means voting against Hilary, so be it. Actually, I'll be voting FOR getting out of this war and out of Iraq and finishing the job in Afghanistan in the right way. Perhaps if Bush stuck with AFghanistan and did it right in the first place, his ratings would be a hell of alot higher and the congress and senate wouldn't have been turnedover to the democrats. Something for you Repukes to think about next time you get greedy.
2007-02-12 12:44:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They are in too deep now to stop, they will blame Bush to 2012 election. The whole democratic platform is on Blame Bush. This will be neat historically for if it works. It will be a new chapter in American political history for the left will have created a strategy of using the media and creating a hate state to achieve power. So goes the days of issue debate....
2007-02-12 12:47:54 · answer #5 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The policies that Bush enacted will be with the US for a while, it is possible to vote against Bush in 2008 and beyond, by voting against the changes he made.
2007-02-12 12:49:23 · answer #6 · answered by ck4829 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yeah, this country is in serious issue... i feel bad for all of the good republicans out there who have the right ideas, i mean, bush is not my favorite guy in the world, but i don't want to be hatin on the rest of his party, because most of them are very good politicians!! Already we're beginning to see the signs of it, publicity for clinton and obama has way overshadowed that of mccain and guiliani. No one cares about the republicans anymore, and since the iraq war, seems most of the country has turned to the democrats, which is a terrible terrible move, in my opinion, because the democrats have no idea what they are talking about!! this is just ridiculous...
2007-02-12 13:00:44 · answer #7 · answered by I run... 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
McCain's authentic operating mate is George Bush and the failed regulations of the Republican get mutually. And now McCain have him dressed up in a skirt, lipstick, and Tina Fey glasses that fluctuate very well. LOL Did Sarah Palin wrongfully push to have her ex-brother-in regulation fired? grow to be she fairly hostile to the "Bridge to Nowhere?" Did she fairly promote Alaska's plane on eBay, or basically record it on eBay? those are the aspect the persons peoples will prefer to attraction to close inthe coming day and week a head Palin time of dogging questionon the problem and her record is coming to a end OBAMA/BIDEN 2008
2016-12-04 02:45:38 · answer #8 · answered by lesure 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully, in '08 I can vote FOR a candidate instead of AGAINST one...
2007-02-12 12:43:17 · answer #9 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sure they will. They're still voting against Reagan, aren't they?
2007-02-12 12:47:14 · answer #10 · answered by texasjewboy12 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋