English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Compare to past Empires that Conquered and Implemented Rules and Laws over all other nations

2007-02-12 11:50:48 · 12 answers · asked by wicked6string 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

12 answers

Nope.

2007-02-12 11:55:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. Imperialism would be the easy way out, though. That Iraq thing would be over and done with yeterday; if we wanted it to go down like that.
We could take Canada and then they would actually be entitled to call themselves Americans.

The reality is that that middle eastern area of the planet is a threat to everyone else on the planet. That's not a misinterpretation of the facts. Attempting to rebuild a benevolent society in Iraq and surrounding areas is an ambitious challenge. Imperialism would be faster and cheaper; but clearly another choice has been made. That means, no-in answer to your question-in case you don't understand this.

2007-02-12 13:16:05 · answer #2 · answered by limendoz 5 · 0 0

Did you in basic terms heavily thieve strains from the Communist Manifesto? simply by fact it looks like i'm analyzing it yet lower back. at first, it would be VERY complicated to purpose and pull off with our contemporary inhabitants. the element approximately socialism is that if the federal government screws up, all people interior the rustic suffers. And there would be extremely some screwing up. Socialism would not paintings. in case you "unfold the wealth" and take a look into to do away with instructions, you apart from would do away with opposition. You do away with a lot of people's prefer to circulate so some distance as they'd, what's the factor? they won't gets a commission extra acceptable of they try further. If a doctor's money is going to a automobile mechanic with the aid of taxes, what do you think of extremely some people would opt for? What approximately well being? people wait six hours interior the ER waiting for care, even then while they get scientific interest they're limited like thirty minutes. As of wonderful now, interior the USA, with our capitalist equipment we've the utmost maximum cancers survival cost. the place do foreigners circulate to have a important surgical operation they'd't get of their u . s .? the USA. Why does the US get maximum of immigrants? "Capitalism looks to in basic terms paintings for the rich and makes salary slaves out of the detrimental." it is not how this is. i'm residing in us of a of america, and that i see time-honored people, no longer detrimental, no longer rich, understanding their familiar. the rich nor the detrimental dominate, that's the working middle classification. besides, us of a of america simply by fact the wealthiest detrimental interior the worldwide. Heck, i'd desire to be on foodstuff stamps and that i've got a cellular telephone. you're observing capitalism with an exceedingly pessimistic attitude, it purely is unlike that.

2016-09-29 00:55:08 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The KGB has spent billions upon billions of dollars spreading propaganda through the years about the United States. Calling our country "Imperialistic" was about the number one or two thing on that agenda, right next to their spreading rumors that the CIA was responsible for AIDS in Africa. You have been brainwashed by one of our country's oldest enemies. If you have half a brain, you won't dismiss my post as McCarthyism, but you will instead research what I say and actually discover it to be true. However, I don't hold out much hope that you actually will show yourself as such an intellect.

2007-02-12 12:22:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sadly, yes. This is why the American populace supported the war in Iraq. To an extend it is true and to an extend it isn't true because the whole American populace is divided. Most of the American populace doesn't know whats going on and the politicians want to keep it that way, which is why there is so many things happening societally, such as immigration etc..

2007-02-12 12:09:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Not yet, but there is danger. There are way to many politicians who think because they were elected to public office they are therefore superior to the common herd and entitled to impose their ideas on the rest of us. Throw the bums out next election.

2007-02-12 11:57:19 · answer #6 · answered by hironymus 7 · 1 1

I don't think a majority of the American people are particularly imperialistic. Corporate c.e.o.s and their bought and payed for politicians (including our "president") are.

2007-02-12 11:58:37 · answer #7 · answered by socrates 6 · 1 0

No they hae not, they are only in other nations because of the UN, I say dump the useless UN and let the world fend for itself!

2007-02-12 11:55:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No, but once the Death Star is finished....look out world!

2007-02-12 11:58:29 · answer #9 · answered by Bob 6 · 0 0

No. We aren't & won't be. It just isn't in our national character.

2007-02-12 13:01:46 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers