English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-12 11:39:53 · 4 answers · asked by Cey 2 in Arts & Humanities Other - Arts & Humanities

can u give me tha sites ure gettin this from..and tha author title and date accessed

2007-02-12 11:50:27 · update #1

4 answers

The major differences are perspective, the ability to portray the subject matter in a visually pleasing three dimensional manner, and the subject matter. During the renaissance the common people were shown in classic poses and at everyday activities where medieval art generally was religious in nature. The refinement in technique and paint manufacture (albeit by the artists themselves) also shows an obvious difference.

2007-02-12 11:46:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the middle a protracted time have been what's referred to as the 'darkish a protracted time' besides. So those got here in the previous the Renaissance. interior the middle a protracted time, there gave the impression to be no communique between international places, and the paintings had in fact stopped. while the Renaissance got here, it became like a great awakening, and right away there became extremely some communique, and intensely some kinds of paintings.

2016-09-29 00:54:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The Renaissance was a different period of time than Medievel times. When the Renaissance began, medievel times ceased.
So you have people painting for those years, and bam art, music and everything practically changed overnight into the renaissance period.

2007-02-12 11:43:19 · answer #3 · answered by jprofitt303 5 · 0 1

renaissance art was more focused on man and i mean simply the common person & medievel art is still relegious based and focused more on the nobles

2007-02-12 11:44:21 · answer #4 · answered by David M 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers