A doomed concept of a guest worker program has always been in place. Those who subscribe to it criminally invite and hire undocumented Mexican labor in order to avoid paying Americans a legal and decent wage. THEN, they deny the children of those workers equal access to an education. Then, later, as their communities begin to fail and collapse under the stupidity and incompetence of intolerance and morally corrupt social "planning", they take Mexicans out into the desert and shoot them. AND, they vote Presidents into office who promise to give states more "rights" back. Intolerance, conservatism, racism and moral morbidity breeds a level of stupidity in people that leads them to be unable to accept that what "states rights" REALLY means is states, not the national taxpayer, gets to pay the bill for their own states' problems. So, the morons who wanted to weaken the federal government are now all whiny about the federal government not footing the bill for state problems. All borders are being eliminated. Become informed about the new Superstate, SPP.
http://www.spp.gov
2007-02-12 11:02:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, I live in a rural area and I support the guest worker. When I was a kid it was not uncommon for us younger folk to do the farm work when it came time to and honestly, it is good money. However times have changed and demographics have changed as well. Today we have a glut of fast food restaurants and they have eaten up the cheap young labor. The line of people to do the work is not there like it use to be.
Now I am proud of the time I spent cutting, spiking and barning tobacco, plus the time I spent throwing hay bails onto trailers, I could go on. It was honest work for honest pay. However I am not naive enough to think kids today are going to quit their day job for two weeks of hard labor (it pays good but not that good). Some one has to harvest the crops and guest workers are excellent for that.
Guest workers do not want to stay here, they just want a quick buck then they head back to their home country. Amnesty rewards those who disregarded the system. So when you are speaking of amnesty you are forgiving and actually granting dual citizenship to someone who really doesn't deserve it. Guest worker is someone following the rules set forth.
2007-02-12 10:26:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by JFra472449 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Republican party? Thats a humorous tale. they p.c. an selection to prepared hard paintings, so they p.c. illegals. i truthfully hate people who make this a left amazing difficulty via fact its no longer. the two between the typical events have a vested pastime in seeing it proceed. So we could cut back the liberals are traitors crap, and get severe. i'm anti-unlawful myself, and that i p.c. a advantage based immigration equipment, yet i've got not got self belief for a 2nd that if I vote republican that something would be completed.
2016-10-02 01:02:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm pretty sure there are heavy fines involved for the people who have already been working here illegally. Since the crimes they committed were not violent crimes, that's about par for the legal course, just as one rarely gets prison time for vandalism or littering or even many first-offense thefts.
2007-02-12 10:25:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Vaughn 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
You tell me, would they have to go back and start over? Amnesty means doing away with a punishment for past acts, not conferring new rights to continue to act that way going forward. Anything that would legalize illegals, with ability to be permanent residents later, and make us continue to drain our kids' education funds to pay to educate their kids is a step beyond amnesty.
So let's not get caught up in semantics and just turn to solutions. Do you have one?
2007-02-12 10:28:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by DAR 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
not for all, but it could lead to amnesty later.
2007-02-12 10:20:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
YES!!!!!
Next question, please.
2007-02-12 11:30:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by usaf.primebeef 6
·
0⤊
1⤋