English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There are 80,000 registered charities in Canada who report $11 billion in donations annually. Are other Countries receiving around the same figure yearly? If the Charities were created to prevent poverty why has there been so little change economically in poor Countries?

Charities = Billion Dollar Industry

Don't you think people should start giving directly to the poor in need? How can people learn who the poor people really are so that they can give money directly to them either by cash or by transferring money directly into bank accounts?

2007-02-12 09:48:46 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

6 answers

Isn't this the same question you just asked?

Take it easy. It's okay to feel strongly about something, but it's pretty annoying when you post the same thing repeatedly in a matter of minutes.

2007-02-12 09:54:20 · answer #1 · answered by CrazyChick 7 · 0 0

Charities know the most effective and efficient method to help people. Yes some money goes towards them (naturally to keep them going), but charity is more than helping out poor people. There are lots of people around the world that needs help besides money.

I'm surprised Canada gives 11 Billion a year. They only have around 32 million people. Good for them.

2007-02-12 09:56:17 · answer #2 · answered by Big Daddy Jim 3 · 0 0

this would not relatively answer your question. yet, my thoughts are that in case you ought to no longer detect the funds for the adoption it likely should not be completed to no longer element out the countless costs in touch as at once as a results of fact the adoption is finalized. My techniques are an comparable mutually as a kinfolk comes to a decision to have a infant. I understand that accidents do ensue yet many cases human beings breed no longer bearing in mind the outcomes (way of lifestyles transformations, costs to improve a infant, and so forth..) of course many additionally do no longer care and make certain to end that besides. My companion and that i observed an excellent woman enormously a lot 2 yrs interior the previous. We had tried yet had fertility situation concerns and the prospect provided itself to undertake. My companion is in nursing and characteristic been given a decision approximately her. we've been already financially solid and ought to pay for the adoption. We did no longer ought to stay with an employer employer (it grew to improve into into seen a private adoption) so the fee grew to improve into into much less and we found out approximately her 10days previously start up. She'll be 2 on Sept 2 and is the buzz of our lifestyles.

2016-12-17 15:06:46 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Family and friends can provide information like names, addresses, and phone numbers of those they know in poor Countries that are in need financially. They could discuss amongst each other how they can transfer money.

Networking = giving
Giving = reduced poverty
Reduced poverty = pay it forward
Pay it forward = reduced suffering

2007-02-12 10:49:27 · answer #4 · answered by Soul saviour 4 · 0 0

Too much of the money goes into the running of the charity.
I have found a group of women in Indonesia who are fast becoming self sufficient and that is where I will help.

2007-02-12 10:00:52 · answer #5 · answered by Maritz 2 · 2 0

they are making enough to end all the problems they make money off. but if they spent it all on their causes, they wont have money next year. there is no money for them in spending it to end suffering.

they are all eventually tracked back to religion, and that is the biggest greed machine available. donate! tithe! feel happy.

2007-02-12 10:03:21 · answer #6 · answered by SAINT G 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers