What has been the best empire the word has ever seen?

Question

Roman? Egyptian? The British? The Americans? Greek? Mongolian? Who????

The Summarians? The Babalonians? Who??????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 1

I'll go with Rome.

Rome's superiority can be seen in both the duration and the imitation of its empire. Rome rose to imperial status with its victory in the Second Punic War at the beginning of the second century BC, and a Roman state remained in existence until the fall in 1453 of Constantinople (capital of the Eastern Roman Empire and whose rulers and people called themselves Romanoi to the end). Roman power at its greatest--from 200 BC to the eclipse of the Eastern Empire around 1200 CE--affected 10 to 20 percent of the earth's population. And this influence was more good than bad. The silly dialogue in "Monty Python's Life of Brian"--what have the Romans ever done for us other than building schools, maintaining roads, bringing order, introducing good wine, etc.--accurately captures the benefits the Romans brought.

Equally important is the continued influence of Rome in the Western world. Latin remains the official language of the Catholic church. America's Founding Fathers and their contemporaries in Europe sweated over the details of Roman law, statecraft, and history in trying to create durable republican constitutions. American currency is full of inspiring Latin mottos, including "E pluribus unum" and "Novus ordo seclorum." No, without Rome and its empire, I'd probably be living in some stinking bog in a Germany without autobahns, wearing no clothes other than blue paint, and in thrall to the worship of Wotan the All-Father.

Ave Roma!

Answer 2

Roman Empire.

Answer 3

British Empire. It is the last empire on earth to 1) Control such a vast territory, and 2) to remain intact to this day, although somewhat smaller.

Unlike all other empires, they've fought and mostly won as an empire starting from the 1500's until the 1900's.

No other nation will be able to do so in todays day and age.

Answer 4

i've got by no potential understood the human beings who think of Christianity desires to be rescued from Paul. i'm getting the certainty which you do in contrast to him-- or a minimum of you do no longer purely like the flaws he mentioned. and that i additionally comprehend which you haven't any longer have been given plenty use for me the two, via fact I take the view that Paul replace into chosen via Jesus to assert those issues. nicely, to be thoroughly common, there are probable different clarification why you and that i do no longer fairly connect. i'm no longer the main likable guy interior the worldwide. So i'm going to own the blame for that. yet Christianity is geared up on the commencing place of Christ and the Apostles. Paul replace into considered one of those. with the point to reject him is to reject the religion. that's basically that straightforward. for sure you're loose to attain this. Lot's of human beings do. yet are not you assuming the pose of an authoritative spokesman for Christ once you ask questions like this? the place, precisely, do you get such authority? Who commissioned you to "restoration" Christianity? no longer me; that's for specific. and not any of the different billion or so Christians that i'm attentive to. Christ based a Church. so some distance as i comprehend, the Church has continually known Paul's authority. Am I incorrect approximately this? if so, i'd be fairly involved to be sure evidence to that consequence. Paul would not choose an empire to take care of him. His words stand on their own. the only "protection" mandatory is the acceptance that he's likely considered one of the pillars of the religion. that's like protecting my grandfather against the declare that he's probably no longer considered one of my ancestors. as quickly as that's carried out, the argument is over.

Answer 5

Long live the Brits, man!

Having hailed from a British colony myself, I always think it's remarkable how far and how long their grip extended. As it was was once said, 'The sun never sets on Britain', and that was because, for a time - thanks to time changes and locations - the sun WAS always shining on britsih soil. I don't know what you think, but I'd say that's still pretty remarkable.

Going around the world, hear how many English speaking naions or those who are taught English - speak with British tinted accents. Africa to India, you can still see people drawling in that certain way thanks to memories of a time of a British rule.

Britain is also one of the few empires to not go crashing terribly down - they're no longer in their heyday, but they managed to settle down quietly without totally imploding and still remaining a successful nation. Few empires can boast that. They survived two world wars, and still retain some of their original colonies - that my friend, is what I call an empire.

Answer 6

Well in terms of shear size. The Mongolians. but in terms of power and length of terms either the Ottoman or the Roman empire.

Answer 7

It's an extremely subjective question. What defines the best? The one with the most land? The most population? Perhaps works of art are what you're more interested in, so whoever produced the most artists or philosophers? The one where people reported they were the happiest? The one with the most relative military power?

It's all a question of judgment. In my opinion, the idea of empire is distasteful in itself, as it subjugates the idea of freedom to the idea of nation. Empires did allow for a lot of easy transmission of ideas and in that sense, helped advance the human species, but it would seem to me that empires are great in this sense in spite of themselves. Their aim is to demonstrate power, to crush the outsider, it is only by accident that they foster human development.

Answer 8

The "Empire" in Star Wars!

Answer 9

the asian are the best empire the world has ever seen.

Answer 10

I like the Aztecs