I know the girl must have been nervous as all get out ... but honestly ... TOTALLY NOT IMPRESSED with her voice. Hence, totally disappointed. I know that my opinion doesn't matter, since obviously she was "voted" the finalist to perform w/ JT, but ... I personally don't think it should have been her to win (although, I know people in the "industry" and if American Idol & other shows winners are "fixed" - yes folks, your vote really doesn't count - then it's POSSIBLE it didn't count this time either.)
2007-02-12 09:03:10 · 2 answers · asked by mrs sexy pants 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
No! The Grammy's were boring as usual this year and it's sad that they would stoop to put an "American Idol" reject on the show and declare her the "winner" of some lame contest. She was okay but is not the best out there by a long shot. The best performers were Mary J., Christina A, and The Red Hot Chilli Peppers! And the Dixie Chicks (even though I liked the way they spoke out against the war) are so not pretty or cute!
2007-02-12 09:29:13 · answer #1 · answered by cats 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, you are not the only one that wasn't impressed. Basically, the only great and impressive performers at the Grammys was Christina Aguilera and Mary J. Blige.
2007-02-12 17:10:48 · answer #2 · answered by ♥♥Bree♥♥ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋