A miss. Janette Tulmoth was found dead in her home. Five gun shots riddled her body. Her jewelry littered the floore and her back window was broken but no glass was on the floor. the shots were all in her back.
Who murdered her? Her mother? Her boyfriend? a robber? Who killed Janette Tulmoth? Name two pieces of eveidence.
2007-02-12 08:46:00 · 6 answers · asked by Conseption 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Why I posted it here: I like you guyses ideas.
2007-02-12 08:46:48 · update #1
Nope not quite Hasse
2007-02-12 08:56:27 · update #2
nope Evan. I'll give you a hint. One of the clues is in book seven of FAKE ( a gay manga)
2007-02-12 08:58:02 · update #3
J D is right!
2007-02-12 09:06:26 · update #4
Ok, I'll play,
The Glass was broken in such a way it would have been smashed from the inside. Her jewellery was not taken and was all over the floor as if in a struggle. She was shot from behind.
Therefore,
The Mother killed Her. She would have been welcomed in the house, so no break in. She probably didn't approve of the boyfriend and they may have had a fight, maybe? She would not have taken the jewellery, probably from panic. Finally, she was shot in the back 5 times which implies two things: 1. it was a crime of passion and 2. the person who shot her probably did so because they could not face her or more likely, she turned back to leave which further aggrivated the killer.
Sounds like two women to me.
2007-02-12 09:04:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It obviously was an inside job, as the window being broken without glass on the floor suggests it was broken from the inside. The shots being in her back suggests it was not a suicide, as I can't imagine how someone could shoot themselves 5 times in the back without collapsing first. Also, since she had to have turned her back on the person who shot her, it had to be someone she trusted. It interests me that her jewelry was ransacked on an inside job, because inside jobs usually are done for murder gains, not monetary profits (outside of life insurance). If she had jewelry that could "litter the floor", she must be wealthy, and she had to get the money from somewhere, so maybe they were tired of her spending their money? If it wasn't her boyfriend, then I would guess one of her parents, they're the only other financial support she has other than herself and her bf.
2007-02-12 17:03:56 · answer #2 · answered by guitarherofairy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'll guess the boyfriend. No glass on floor seems to argue against the robber. why not the mother? most women they say are better shots, and wouldn't spend 5 where 2 would do.
2007-02-12 16:51:25 · answer #3 · answered by hasse_john 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Her boyfriend because the robber didn't take her jewelry, sounds like an inside job. maybe there was a struggle, she tried to walk away from him and he shot her in the back.
Must be the mother then.
2007-02-12 16:56:37 · answer #4 · answered by What'd You Say? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A woman robber. Women aim for the chest not the face subconsciously , as seen in FAKE seven
2007-02-12 17:04:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
May I declare the 5th?
2007-02-12 16:51:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋