So after WWII and the Holocaust, the British gave the Jews Israel which angered the Palestinians and other Arabs. That in turn made many Palestinians and Arabs angry at he United States for helping Israel in many situations leading up to 9/11 and much hatred towards the U.S.
2007-02-12 08:13:28 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I'd've been helpful, but i think in the end it probably would have still happened. They're still pretty upset about america's interest in them for oil.
It took forever for america to get into kosovo or bosnia, but they were in kuwait pretty fast. Not sure about the history of suicide bombing, but bosnia really brought it back i think. Bosnians had no weapons, so if the serbians were comming, a few people would strap some bombs to themselves and dive under tanks. It gave time for the rest of the people in the village to escape. If those people didn't do that, then everyoen would've been dead. Most peopel considered it pretty heroic.
Another more recent situation is the chechynan's trying to break away from russia. Well documented, not speculation.....but when the russians had them surruonded in the capitol, they paid some of the russian generals to let them escape (the russians would only surround them from 3 sides leaving an out). The generals agreed but then set up land mines on the escape route.
So the less experienced fighters ran ahead to set off the mines, so the more experienced fighters could survive. So there might be some question to the legitimacy of the whole conflict, but this act of self sacrifice is what tends to come to mind.
But regardless, these are the Islamically "ok" situations to commit suicide, where you are rewarded if you sacrifice your life for your religion or to save someone elses life.
So suicide bombing would've still been here and then all you need is a few rich people with their own agenda to convince people that flying a plane into a building full of civilians is holy.
2007-02-12 08:39:43 · answer #1 · answered by My name is not bruce 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't suppose the holocaust occurred the best way it's mentioned to have occur in these days (6 million jews and six million non-jews). All the time the holocaust tale alterations. All clinical and historical proof aspects to just a couple hundred thousand died at such a lot, and such a lot of the ones had been from illnesses and hunger. In truth, such a lot trained humans agree. I query the legitimate holocaust tale similar to each person will have to. It does not make you anti-Jewish or some thing. We have got to bear in mind that now not simplest Jews died however each person that disagreed with the Nazis. I don't wish to disclaim the holocaust now not simplest since it occurred however since my ancestors had been within the largest holocaust of all occasions.
2016-09-05 08:05:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know, you might have a point.
It's conjecture, sure, but Israel certainly is a rallying point for signing up new terrorists.
However, terrorists don't need a reason to commit mayhem, they just need a pretext. We hadn't done anything to the Muslims. In fact, we let them try to blow up the World Trade Center before, and we did nothing. Same when they attacked the U.S.S. Cole. Same when they bombed our embassies.
We are just a convenient excuse for the terrorists. If these people had any sense, they would be on their hands and knees in abject gratitude that, unlike the hypocritical Arab and Persian states, we freed two countries from very different kinds of tyrants. In Afghanistan, we freed them from the grim rule of insame Islama-fascists called the Taliban.
In Iraq, we freed the people from the deathgrip of Saddam Hussein and his two nighmarishly evil sons, all of whom were raping the country of its wealth.
2007-02-12 08:22:20 · answer #3 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
9/11 happened because of a difference in opinion between terrorists and the US. It really had nothing to do with the Holocaust, I don't think that if the Holocaust had not happened that 9/11 wouldn't have happened. They are not entwined that much.
2007-02-12 08:22:32 · answer #4 · answered by Hawaiisweetie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What if Bin Laden was never born? Would 9/11 have happened?
2007-02-12 08:31:11 · answer #5 · answered by handbag_addict_2006 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guarantee to you the world towers center
are both collapse in front my eyes
and after that we smell dead body for 2 weeks
then people can believe what they wants I don't really care
2007-02-12 08:34:15 · answer #6 · answered by frostycookies9 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no way to know. It is pointless to play the 'what if' game. If the holocaust had not happened who knows how the world would have gone.
2007-02-12 08:21:03 · answer #7 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no, Osama used the Israel argument to incite more "jihadists"
he used the Israel arguemnt AFTER, he stated that he doesnt like our way of life, and that he has a "duty" to convert us to Islam, or kill us if we refuse.
THAT has nothing to do with Israel
2007-02-12 08:23:05 · answer #8 · answered by chumpchange 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
interesting point...and it is probably true.
however that is like saying had there been no united states, there wouldnt have been a 9/11.
of course it's true, but it doesnt exactly mean that one was responsible for the other.
2007-02-12 08:21:47 · answer #9 · answered by Mr. O 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Would you exist? maybe your grand or great grandmother would have met a different man who actually died in WWII
... why dont u think about that!
2007-02-12 08:22:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋