English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know many have said that 17" is good, but do you think a 14.1" would do okay or not?
I am not really editing, but I do like to save pictures of specific things (plants) and keep a file on them.

2007-02-12 07:09:06 · 3 answers · asked by Charles R 1 in Computers & Internet Hardware Laptops & Notebooks

3 answers

That’s all we had a few years ago but needed a suitable graphics card to display at maximum resolution with 16 or 32 bit colour settings. Later ones ran at 1024 x 768 pixels x 32 bits. The only other ingredient, particularly for modern large images, is suitable software that allows you to zoom in to display the full picture on the screen (or Window), preferably automatically on loading. Such as MS Paint does not do that but Windows XP Picture and Fax Viewer does.

Many 17 inch CRT monitors only displayed 1024 x 768 pixels and modern 19 inch LCD monitors run at 1280 x 1024, not enough pixels for modern camera photos, and useless without appropriate software.

Roy

2007-02-13 03:18:01 · answer #1 · answered by ROY L 6 · 0 0

Yup. Good reading here.

2007-02-12 07:24:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes -- it is OK...just OK. The bigger, the better!

2007-02-12 07:12:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers