It seems that in the good ole USA if you do not agree with the Government and have views of your own, even though you're not physically harming or endangering anyone, You're automatically considered a Terrorist? How stupid is that? Freedom of speech is in our US Constitution and we shall continue to voice what is our god given right. One of few we have left anymore. Wake Up America the Government is wanting the upper hand and wants to strip our rights out from under us. Don't let this happen. God Bless America and God Bless the Real Legal American Citizens of this Country. Personally a terrorist is one who enters our country "ILLEGALLY" and breaks the laws of our land, one who steals from the Taxpayers of this country with no intentions of doing whats right. Robbing our Welfare Systems, Hospitals, Food Banks, and any other means of freebies to them. Those services are for the US Legal Citizens. Taxpayers deserve better than this. Stop this Unwanted Invasion!!!
2007-02-12 07:08:41 · 13 answers · asked by txdixiechk1 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
okay, I'm just wondering: who are these terrorists you are referring to? I haven't heard of anyone branded one that hasn't actually conspired to instill terror. The closest were the Dixie Chicks but they weren't branded terrorists. They were simply boycotting for speaking their minds.
I'd also like to point out that there is a BIG difference between illegal immigrants and terrorists. Illegal immigrants are people that have crossed over our borders without authorization in order to live a better life than they are accustomed. Now, I'm not saying it's right, but the majority are not here to hurt people.
A Terrorist is someone who attempts to inspire others with terror (hence the name). They kill in the name of their country or religion but they do not kill (usually) combatants. They kill civilians in order to make other ordinary citizens fearful of going to work or going to the market or going out to play. Both may be breaking the law, but being an illegal immigrant is a far cry from being a terrorist.
2007-02-12 07:13:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I don't consider a person a terrorist just because they disagree with the gov. but I do believe that there is a right and wrong way to get your point across. By going public and running down the president or the troops on a world stage during war times you are hurting the mission by playing into the propaganda war. It is harmful to our troops and it helps the enemy. There is no room for doubt and second guessing by our troops on the ground. I was in Daddy Bush's military during Desert Storm and I know from my experience that the media and peace protesters here in the country hurt moral on the front. Vote the people you disagree with out of office and campaign for the one you support. We have the same views on your other issues here and we do have the ability to correct our government if we use our voting power wisely.
Many of the Bush bashers and anti war people are just like a modern day Tokyo Rose playing to the enemy.
2007-02-12 07:26:05 · answer #2 · answered by joevette 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You forgot the U. S.. we've a protracted background of sponsoring terrorists too. i do no longer think of the Saudi government has any pastime in sponsoring terror communities who espouse a creed like Osama bin weighted down, via fact it would be risky to their very own hobbies. The Saudis have been slightly sluggish to ascertain basically how risky, yet they figured it out via the previous due Eighteen Nineties. Iran has unfold a similiar revoltionary doctrine, yet there's a hitch there too: The Sunnis like Osama bin weighted down and Ayman Zawahiri incredibly do in comparison to Iranians especially, and Shia mulsims often. area of the reason you don't comprehend some issues is which you haven't any longer examined the info, the persons, their worldviews, the governments and their strategic hobbies (a minimum of what they suspect them to be), etc.
2016-10-02 00:48:30 · answer #3 · answered by ridder 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a 2 part answer for you.
#1 The government expects loyalty. They are the decision makers and they want the people to follow their decisions.
#2 Illegal immigration will not be a problem once the implementation of the North American Union becomes addressed publicly. This union is already policy and being advanced in it's duties.
I would provide you with the ip address to check this out yourself but Y!A has blocked me from submitting it!
Everytime I have tried to provide it as part of an answer I get a screen that pops up that says ERROR 999.
I have tried to provide this address SEVERAL TIMES AND WAYS
But it won't go through....the address alone must send up a red flag in Yahoo!
Interesting!
Anyway what this union idea includes is to unite Canada-Mexico-and the US. All would still have their sovereignty but a free flow of citizenship and commerce.
They are currently through the Eminent Domain laws taking private property to build a super highway from Canada to Mexico.
There are public meetings going on in Texas, Oklahoma, and other states where people are publicly asking questions and voicing opposition to this proposal.
I wish I could provide you with this address.....anyone who wants to can e-mail me directly and I will e-mail it back!
kelly_brown537@yahoo.com
2007-02-12 07:33:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A terrorist is anybody that illegally, rob, steal, kill, come here illegally and do harm to our people, country knowingly or unknowingly. There are all types of terrorists and the invasion from the south it is also consider a type of Terrorism.
2007-02-12 07:37:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraqi's are Freedom Fighters.
They are fighting the CIA and DIA and their terrorist activities.
When it comes to illegal immigrants coming mainly from Central America and South America it is up to the US authorities to impression the Americans who hire illegals. And send the Latinos back home with $500.00 cash an a first class ticket to a country of their choice.
2007-02-12 07:22:39 · answer #6 · answered by lovefights 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree, all them , needs to be sent back home via what ever means necessary. Freedom of speech , we have it now, we better take advantage of it, after 2008, there could be no guarantee of this any longer.
2007-02-12 07:20:19 · answer #7 · answered by m c 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
its this new thing the conservatives are pushing for. if you dont agree with the president or you have your own mind, you are labeled a liberal and the door is shut in your face...
2007-02-12 07:17:29 · answer #8 · answered by billnted 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dude, I think I hear the dinner bell at your Militia camp ringing.
2007-02-12 07:15:02 · answer #9 · answered by Philip McCrevice 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
NO one government is perfect...you got a problem take it up with your elected officials!
2007-02-12 07:14:07 · answer #10 · answered by boricua_lilly 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋