English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You know how when women have sex they look fatter and wider because they've been "broken"? To me they look so weird. Then when they have kids they look even wider, fatter, and more crooked, because now they're even more "broken." I find this repulsive. I also find pregnancy, the way in which they become pregnant, and all this, totally disgusting. Thinking of all of this induces my vomit. You know how people think that when a man loves a woman they have sex and stuff? This is so fake, because how can this repulsive act be called love? Gross..Love is something pure, not this worthless **** or sex. You know how they also call it natural? Well, if it's so natural, how come women and everyone knows that when a virgin first has sex it hurts like hell, and she bleeds, and all these horrendous things. How in the infernal hell can this be called love? I know for sure its not love. It's sex, an animal act, and not love. People are nasty. Since all of this happens, then sex between a man and a

2007-02-12 07:03:19 · 4 answers · asked by Oscar 1 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

woman is not really "natural." I'ts just an animal act. After these facts, who still thinks that an intelligent god would have a preference over "strait" sex? Men who are homophobic made this up. There's no preference, and if there was, I have a sort of clue that's it's not for damn "straight" sexual people. Also then pain a woman has to go through when she's giving birth, eww...Who would want to go through all of this; an idiot. It's like the male who ****** her is punishing her. So, this is not love, but a scam, an ugly scenery. Maybe the only good thing about all of this stupidity is to give god a son, and nothing else, and those who enjoy the sex are sinners.
What in the hell kind of christian believes that we didn't come from monkeys (evolution) believes that a god would prefer man to woman love

2007-02-12 07:03:44 · update #1

.I thought we as humans, are superior to animals. Since we're superior to animals, we then can have a pure thing as love, where no one gets broken, or hurt, or has to go through immense pain, which is not man to woman love by the way; man to woman love has consequences, pain of birth, of the sex, and change in body to the worse, and in previous years before medicine, death.Since we humans are superior to animals maybe that's why god made it possible for men to fall in love with other men and women to fall in love with other woman. Maybe he thinks this is better, and makes us superior to animals?...maybe? If there's a god, what makes us superior to animals is the fact that we have the possiblity to fall in love wth everyone no matter what organ they have...If there's no god then maybe we're just a bunch of animal monkey people who have urges and are in need to reproduce, and being gay is a mental oddness.

2007-02-12 07:04:02 · update #2

No, I think there's actually a god...Besides, it has been scientifically proven, it's been a while actually, since the 70's, that homosexuality is not a mental illness, so the fact that it's a choice is crossed out....Therefore, god made gays. I'm not trying to change the gay marriage thing, because gay marriage is not an issue due to the fact that there's such a thing as separation of church and state in our constitution. I'm just trying to make a point, that's all. Notice how all gays have been coming out in the 80's and 90's and stuff? Well, it's all god's plan...He can see the overpopulation, and maybe gays are just a present form god so that we don't overpopulate ourselves. Honestly these are probably the facts...It's logical...

2007-02-12 07:04:21 · update #3

4 answers

What exactly is your question?
You seem to be punching in two directions!
Come on, try again, if you have anything to say,
I am sure you can say it in 30 seconds!
As it is it is way too long!

2007-02-12 07:18:16 · answer #1 · answered by saehli 6 · 0 0

Uh, please calm down.

You may feel this way frankly because you 1) are gay, so there is obviously no interest for you in having or understanding "straight" sex. And 2) you have some serious misconceptions about straight sex.

I may be wrong, but there is just as likely to be pain during first-time gay sex as there is during first-time straight sex. There are many women who don't experience a lot of pain and men who experience a great deal.

As for pain during childbirth, it has a physical function, its the way the human body works, women over many many years have found many ways to deal with it. And we still elect to have babies in spite of it, and for a few still elect to feel the pain.

And of course the physical act of sex is animal-like (for both gay and straight people). We are after all, apart from our brains and our human souls, animals. If you have sex to do no more than satisfy a physical need then, gay or straight, rightly or wrongly, you are behaving like an animal.

God created us to be what we are. To be human beings who feel the need to have sex. How we choose fulfill those needs is the difference between an animal-like act and a loving act. Not whether the act takes place between people of the same or opposite gender.

2007-02-12 15:32:34 · answer #2 · answered by jennette h 4 · 1 0

"Why do I think that straight sex is repulsive?" sigh. well, then, why are you watching it? do you have an aversion to women in general? non-heterosexual sex is not all that pleasant the first time around either, membranes need to be stretched to accommodate. if you are in a MM or FF relationship, it's still sex, it's still penetration, just of a different means. it sounds more like your problem is deeply seeded in women or in sex, both physically and psychologically. God created everyone of us, some straight couples choose not to have kids, some gay couples chose artificial insemination or to adopt. i think you need to understand your own urges before you dismiss others.

2007-02-12 15:43:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Get over yourself. Your logic makes no sense whatsoever. If women didn't procreate, you wouldn't be here. *rolls eyes* If you want to be gay, be gay. But don't start bashing the heteros and women. It makes you look a bit hypocritical....

2007-02-12 15:17:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers