http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=2857800
Dems are still only fabricating its seriousness for political reasons .....Right???
2007-02-12 06:39:37 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
My point is that he admits it's existance at all!!
How many times on this board have you seen answers that will not even admit its existance!!
Hopefully this won't be a political issue but an environmental movement!!
2007-02-12 06:58:22 · update #1
Did you watch the video?
He avoids the question of whether or not global warming is manmade or not. Then he seems to say that there is a problem, and that he is working to address it. HE is saying that it's serious!
How do the Dems "fabricate" global warming's seriousness? You've got to give some examples or your claim is crap.
More crap is the way Bush is dealing with the scientifically-validated (what does it matter what he thinks of global warming -- he's not a scientist!) phenomenon of global warming. He's not doing anything except setting arbitrary goals and saying that technological research will get us out of the mess we're in.
That's not good enough.
Do your research before you write a question.
2007-02-12 06:58:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush says in that clip that Global Warming is a serious issue. It does show a slight movement left from his old stance. Nobody is fabricating anything about global warming.
2007-02-12 06:51:39 · answer #2 · answered by miggity182 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well one point this video you linked makes. Bush doesn't need a script to know what to say.
All she asked him was his stance on emissions caps. And his reply, which she chose to ignore the first time, was that there are efficiency standards, and if those aren't met then we can look at emissions caps.
Its pretty hard to say anything more without getting into specifics and since it was an impromptu question without any stats in front of him what more could he say?
2007-02-12 06:55:15 · answer #3 · answered by sociald 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I watched it in it's entirety . I don't get your point . Sorry .
Maybe elaborate a little to help us understand. . . what is your question !!!
2007-02-12 06:50:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't doubt any statement that he made, because they all end up saying nothing about nothing.
2007-02-12 06:45:13 · answer #5 · answered by Nicki 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sounds like exactly what he says about everything...absolutely nothing.
2007-02-12 06:48:20 · answer #6 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋