There is and always will be the potential for another war if Bush is in office. Whatever he opposes (or defends) will lead him to stick his nose into whatever buisness isn't his to begin with. We are in the war in Iraq because he wants to make money for himself, and so he doesn't have to pay a lot for oil. Remember, after September 11th? Remember how albeit for a short time we were looking for Osama Bin Laden, then all of a sudden Bush said "I'm not looking for him, I don't care where he is."? Then all of a sudden the majority of the American people were lead to believe that our war was really with Iraq? "Saddam must be stopped!" That's what we were told.
I agree that what Saddam did was terrible, awful, and cannot be forgiven, but where does that include America (aside from the war in the early 90's)?
Bush's plan (the only one that he TRULY intends to follow through on) is to make sure He (cause ya gotta look out for number 1), Daddy, and his friends can make a nice profit for themselves, or else he'd be a failure in those respective people's eyes.(the calliber of that statement)
Sorry for the long rant, the Bush topic is a fiery one for me.
2007-02-12 06:44:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by lilfireyballofhate 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bush will never get approval to get involved in another war because 1) we don't have the manpower without instituting the draft 2) Congress can't trust any intelligence that comes from the White House 3) The Congress is Democratic
2007-02-12 07:03:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by cthomp99 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
World War 3 is a distinct possibility. Unfortunately the US is playing the villian this time, much like Germany, and Japan did in the past.
2007-02-12 06:47:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
If he was actually, you know, popular any more, than i think he most definitely would, but the good news is that the nation will no longer go on his "gut" feelings when it comes to "war". MAD could happen, but then again, we do have better defense systems in place. so in answer to your question, no he is not, but yes he desperately wants to.
2007-02-12 06:59:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by tinman2022 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont know about him leading us into another war....but the one he got us into already is horrible. At this rate its possible
2007-02-12 06:38:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ashley G 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt everyone in this thread is conscious no count if that's needed or no longer. the government went to warfare on Iraq bc they believed they have been training terrorists, basically like bill Clinton did while he authorized air strikes the week of the Lewinsky tale wreck. We believed he had WMD, which we and one hundred,000 Kurdish families observed firsthand. like it or no longer, the warfare replace into justified to get rid of a dictator who invaded our best chum in 1990 and have been continuously shooting at our plane for the years between the wars. in case you think of he would have been reasoned with, you will desire to have hopped a airplane and tried. And gotten beheaded bc loose-speech it fairly is presented to you right here, isn't available for hundreds of thousands international. and that's nicely worth struggling with for. Its basic to Monday morning quarterback. on your opinion, what proportion American corpses do you would be able to desire to be sure mendacity between fragments of Iranian-made hardware earlier you think of they're in contact? how are you able to suspect they're purely interested in non violent nuclear technologies while they gained't enable inspectors in to confirm? The evidence is there and one would desire to look with readability of purpose and information of distant places coverage and be armed with greater advantageous than purely a pipe dream of what would desire to be in a simplistic comedian-e book actuality. Please do never run for public place of work. different than in Iran.
2016-11-03 06:23:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No single war will ever destroy us. If humanity ever does come to an end it won't be in our lifetime. And, believe it or not, President Bush is not a terrible President.
2007-02-12 06:43:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Large -scale nuclear war does not seem to be possible in this new age of terrorisim.
2007-02-12 06:38:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Circumstances are.
We can either let Iran get nukes, or try to stop them.
Either course will be very dangerous.
God help us.
2007-02-12 06:49:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
What are you talking about?!
If you're talking about Iran...they don't have a prayer against us. If you're talking about North Korea, I'd be more concerned about China getting into the fight.
2007-02-12 06:40:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋