English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Below is an excerpt from a short contract allowing a radio show to play an artists music on their show. I’ve changed the name of the radio show. “X Radio” is just used for example. Should the artist agree to the terms in this excerpt or should they request that it be reworded. In other words, does the radio show get any rights to the music or is this a safe clause for the artist. If the artist should ask for it to be reworded, how so?

EXCERPT:
Artist does hereby acknowledge that X Radio is the sole owner of all rights in and to the Program, and the recording thereof, for all purposes; and that X Radio has the right, among other things, to broadcast the Program one or more times over any station or cable system. Any materials relating to the production and broadcast of the Program become property of X Radio.

2007-02-12 05:39:07 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

3 answers

To me it sounds like the radio station is only talking about recordings/broadcasts of the in-studio performance. If the music has been copyrighted by the artist, X-radio doesn't obtain any interest in that copyright because they've served as an outlet for the songs. They can't come back and claim any royalties based on the original copyright. "Materials relating to the production and broadcast" is referring to any tapes of the broadcast created at the station. The artist can't exercise control of their tapes or limit them replaying the tapes in the future and they won't get roylaties for these subsequent rebroadcasts.
The artist could ask for a time limitation (letting the station replay the recording for 6 months) to prevent the station from making loads of money if the songs turn out to be wildly popular, but I'm willing to bet that this is a standard contract the station has in place and they won't change it unless given a very good reason.

2007-02-12 05:49:01 · answer #1 · answered by bestguessing 3 · 0 0

i'm not lawyer but i would want this reworded. it starts out fine the first part "sole owner of all rights in and to the program and the recording thereof" is fine because it only is talking about the show and they do own the rights to that but "any materials relating to the porduction and broadcast of the program become property of radio x" that is what would worry me

2007-02-12 05:57:12 · answer #2 · answered by MATTHEW B 4 · 0 0

Try the site below for assistance. It has several contracts that might help you in this area.

2007-02-12 06:37:27 · answer #3 · answered by citronge69 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers