2007-02-12 05:32:28 · 15 answers · asked by lost 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
lol of course...It was likely that was the plan all along (= I mean, we already surround Iran by our invasion of afganistan, and look iraq is on the other side of Iran, how convienent....Wake up people.
2007-02-12 05:37:54 · answer #1 · answered by Amethyst 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There will be no premptive strike against Iran, due to the strain such procedures have put on the american image around the world. I think that the catalyst to war with Iran will come in the form of the collapse of the democracies in iraq and lebanon, ushering in regional control by Iran similar to that of the soviet block during the cold war. Unlike the cold war, america will not be the biggest player in an armed standoff, as israel is likely to launch an attack to prevent the nuclear capabilities of iran from increasing. Britian and the U.S. will support their middle eastern ally and launch campaigns from afghanistan, the gulf, and coalition strongholds. i see such events as being highly probable but possibly a decade away. unfortunatly i believe that we are looking at the beginnings of a thrid world war.
2007-02-13 14:05:12 · answer #2 · answered by Robert C 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm sure america has planned to attack Iran because america afraid Iran might be a nuclear threat to america. iran has the might and willpower that gives america goosebumps.
another point is because of the oil on iran.
2007-02-12 18:07:43 · answer #3 · answered by immortal1983 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, It costs a lot to station Two Carrier groups in the Persian Gulf. They will attack Iran. The rationale will be they have Weapons of Mass Destruction or intend to get them and this attack is preemptive.
2007-02-12 13:39:34 · answer #4 · answered by Rja 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IMHO, yes, America is going to attack Iran. Why? Because the writing is on the wall.
2007-02-12 13:46:22 · answer #5 · answered by Deana 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
America will make a bigger mistake to go to war with Iran. Especially when Iran's army is way more powerful than saddam's army. It will only put U.S into more depth.
2007-02-12 13:40:22 · answer #6 · answered by cough cough 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why? Because the thought of Iran having a deliverable nuclear weapon is worrying. Why not? Because they have rather a lot on their plate already.
2007-02-12 13:37:06 · answer #7 · answered by David H 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. We don't have enough troops and we don't want to ignite a huge war. although I bet George Bush's buddies would love it if we did attack.
also, how can anyone really take those 9/11 conspiracy movies seriously . They're such a joke.
2007-02-12 13:39:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
BUSH obviously doesnt want anything in iran..the oil and the money is in iraq!
2007-02-12 13:39:57 · answer #9 · answered by lisa baby... 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably. Iran isn't helping with their inflamatory rhetoric either.
2007-02-12 13:40:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋