2007-02-12 05:15:43 · 3 answers · asked by bettysdad 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
because Bush Cheney and condi already know most people don't trust them.
2007-02-12 06:43:22 · answer #1 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably for their own safety...You act as if these allegations are new,U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad made similar allegations in March 2006.... Proof of these allegations can be found in the analysis of weapons such as a shoulder-fired antiaircraft missile that was fired at a plane flying near the Baghdad airport in 2004 but which failed to launch properly; an Iranian rocket-propelled grenade made in 2006; and an Iranian 81-millimeter mortar made in 2006 , which were found by US troops.Similar weapons and professionally-built EFP's have not been found in the Sunni-dominated Anbar Province, adding to the view that the device is an Iranian-supplied and Shiite-employed weapon.
2007-02-12 13:40:21 · answer #2 · answered by bereal1 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
they don't want to end up in court after the "preemptive attack" like Ari Fleisher and Dick Cheney, I think it's a crime that they are making their case against Iran in the media and not in Congress, I think the plan is to scare the public into supporting an attack and then Congress can either go along with it or risk looking soft on national security
(bereal1) that's a good answer, but what if the U.S. was held responsible for everyone who was attacked using weapons manufactured in America, If I remember correctly Iraq and Afghanistan are among the countries who have traded weapons with the U.S. this may pose a problem?
2007-02-12 13:29:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋