Have Any of Einstein's Theories been Proved Wrong, Other Than...?

Question

the 'cosmological constant', that he had to use in the early 1920s. At that time the expanding universe wasn't known, so he had to invent this; he later retracted it when the expanding universe was known.

I'm looking for another theory, that was proven wrong by somebody esle.

Answer 1

//// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\

...but the cosmological constant turns out to be something after all!

Check this website out: http://einsteinhoax.com/. Here is an excerpt:
"Unlike the mathematical reasoning typically used by theoretical physicists, which has the unfortunate characteristic that the probability of error increases with the number of steps, the probability of error when common sense methods are applied in a disciplined and self consistent manner, in parallel with the necessary mathematics, decreases as the number of steps and factors involved increases. It is impossible to complete a jigsaw puzzle incorrectly."

There are more links to web pages about problems with other Einstein theories at: http://www.crank.net/einstein.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~THIS IS THE BEST WEBSITE~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A REALLY interesting problem with special relativity, involving Albert throwing out the negative result of a square root, then his mistake being accepted by prominent physicists, and, hence, us living with a mistaken sense of reality today, can be found with other very interesting articles at:
http://www.brojon.org/frontpage/EINSTEIN-WENT-WRONG.html
^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^THIS IS THE BEST WEBSITE^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^

//// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\ //// \\\\

Answer 2

They arnt nesesarily wrong they just might not apply to all circumstanceslike newtons law of gravity wich doesnt apply to deep space not every thing that goes up comes down. as for the expanding universe and the big bang if all matter came from the same point in space then you would not have evidence of gallaxy collisions like we do that clearly show two different points of origin prior to colliding unless you modify the timeline and intense grvitational forces needed for a whole galaxy to do a 180 degree turn and hit another galixy this whould have to be billions of bilions of light years. and that kind of time would most surly effect what they call primal matter. the original stuff from the big bang it may be more appropreiate to say there are alot of mini bangs occuring at many diffenet locations in the universe at the same time that would alow for multi-point origin galaxy collisions,primal matter, and black holes all to exist at the same time.

Answer 3

Actually the cosmological constant has made a comeback to explain how the expansion of the universe is accelerating instead of slowing down, only now it is attributed to "dark energy", whatever that is.

Answer 4

Einstein was miffed about Quantum theory. He reckoned that the universe didn't work by chance.