I am amazed at the idiots that belive both of these are true I especially like the ones that think things were good because of Clintons first term hell dont they realize he took over after 16 years of Republican rule ????
2007-02-12 04:30:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
So Bush's tax cuts had nothing to do with making today's US economy as great as it is? Did Reagan's economic reforms in the 1980s not spark the over 20 year success of the US economy since then? Did not Bush signing of the NAFTA treaty greatly expand Free Trade and that was a big help to the US economy? Presidents have A LOT to do with the success or failure of the US economy, not like the Fed Chairman does, but they certainly can have a very big influence on it.
2007-02-12 04:35:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
I could see where they could come up with the conspiracy theories, and I agree about most of what you said in regards to the economy... However, I think the President could have an impact on the economy, not a big one, but the potential is there. For example, I think Clinton is praised for having fixed the economy.
2007-02-12 04:29:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lowa 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
People who said that the bad economy when Bush became President was his fault.
2007-02-12 04:29:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
undemanding iq is one hundred. 75 is the decision for retardation. 100 thirty is "fairly smart" With one hundred forty i trust being genius. do not take any IQ attempt on line, they don't look to be precise. there is not any optimal because that is on a bell curve. After 100 and sixty, you're getting to the right .5% of the international. besides the undeniable fact that it ought to technically bypass on. i trust the optimal ever recorded is someplace in the 220s. Lowest ought to bypass right down to 0 in accordance to how mentally handicapped someone is. I paintings with people whose IQ's are in the 20's and 30's.
2016-12-04 02:15:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wasn't the economy good when Bush became president? Didn't we have a surplus he squandered away by giving tax breaks to the rich while borrowing money from China and Mexico?
2007-02-12 04:32:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ashley 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
There is no word to describe the extent of your ignorance .
No one rational is claiming that terrorists did not fly planes into the towers at one world plaza . It was as obvious to see as are the reports of secondary explosions in the basement and upper levels to complete the destruction of the towers .
Many followers of Judaism owned businesses located in the towers and ups package handlers delivered the explosives to the offices where they were planted . One of there own was in trouble having bought a lemon of a building that needed hundreds of millions of dollars to remove asbestos from the building . SO the plan was when the terrorist attack that the building would come down and Islam would get the blame .
Had you going there for a moment . Bush and his pals did it all .
No need to blame those who follow Judaism for all the worlds problems . They needed a good jumping off point for the next 100 years of military building and profiting of the backs of the workers . You need to tax someone to build all the weapons and pay all the people who make bombs and lately peace activists and democrats where cutting the budgets and profits where in the dumps for years under clinton . Thats why conservatives hate him so much . The working people who pay for it all loved him and wanted and wished he could of gotten a little more head while in office . Its those wacked out conservatives that refuse to pleasure anyone but themselves and look down on oral sex and have passed laws prohibiting it in five states .
2007-02-12 04:44:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by -----JAFO---- 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
AGREED. Clinton had nothing to do when Dot-coms drove the economy back in the day.. Bush has no impact on economy. Its the FED..and consumer behavior.
Clinton's NAFTA treaty did damage to our economy long term, by moving jobs to Mexico..so we can what, buy their products? They have nothing!
Bush's only mistake was listening to Rummy and Cheyney in going to Iraq. They are the real evil guys, Bush is a puppet.
2007-02-12 04:30:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by nezhy 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The economy is good? For whom? When did this happen? If suggesting that things are looking up financially for most people out there is the strongest argument you can come up with to defend Bush, that's very telling, frankly.
2007-02-12 04:37:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by David 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Indeed the Federal Reserve has much more control over the economy than the president. Having said that, the president's reckless spending doesn't help matters......
2007-02-12 04:29:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Philip Kiriakis 5
·
4⤊
1⤋