I'm well aware that it was in fact Bill Clinton, not Hillary, that was actually elected; I just wanted to send out this question to the world after her blatant mainpulation of power during her "term" as first lady....
ANY WOMAN BUT HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT!!
2007-02-12 04:14:11 · 24 answers · asked by Eric W 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I agree!
I am so excited to get a women elected and I am all for women rights- but America has been so centered on race, gender, religion we have to be really careful about who we elect. (If you don't believe that America is focused upon r/g/r then look at the response to Obama running...why is it such a big deal that he's African-American? that's not going to affect whether or not I have social security when I'm 80)
What I mean is it is time for America to step up and after all that talk about acceptance, and equal rights we need to back it by supporting a different kind of candidate from the usual rich, stale politician. But if we just pick someone for their gender, race, religion everyone who is still prejudice is going to watch carefully. If we pick someone who can't perform our progress will be pulled back a few years as all those unbelievers say "I told you so! A woman can't be president."
America- we need to stop being judging others on their color or gender- but we can't just pick the next candidate because of their color or gender either.
My point? I think if Hillary is elected at least 30% (I'm being generous) of the votes will be BECAUSE she is a woman not in spite of it... My apologies to those that truly support her for her policies but lets be informed people rather than biased.
2007-02-12 11:56:19 · answer #1 · answered by bsu07j2911 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the way our shape has been omitted and twisted to in effective condition presidential desires and no genuine senate or congressional efforts to quit the abuse it might seem Clinton (or the different self serving president) could additionally twist the form to make it paintings for them. human beings are too passive and complacent and permit political leaders to flee with too plenty. The greater they get away with the greater they do. Who ever will become the subsequent president would be waiting to assert the priority replace into set while Bush did what he needed so they are able to do what they choose (undergo in strategies how Clinton mentioned different presidents had affairs interior the White domicile so his should not be regarded upon as being undesirable?). We now no longer have a "tests and stability” device we've a coverage of acceptance allowing go with human beings to bully their way via our government. Senators and congressmen compromise their (and our) hobbies with a view to get their own agendas authorized as riders on different charges. we choose enhanced political representatives, common ones who're waiting to take a stand and combat for all human beings and we would desire to cut back what style of riders could be related to a bill.
2016-11-03 06:05:23 · answer #2 · answered by arrocha 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree and I think the Constitution needs to be rewritten to include first ladies... Even though Bill was President, Hilary still had input into things, she has causes she worked with... the first lady, is right next to the President in running things.. some first ladies even ran the Presidency like Nancy, when Ronald started suffering from Alzheimer's... Electing a first lady as President.. is just getting around the two terms.... if Hilary was elected President... Bill would have input just as Hilary did when she was first lady.. it shouldn't be allowed.. so rather than serving only two terms.. the two of them would serve three, and possibly four
2007-02-12 04:20:43 · answer #3 · answered by katjha2005 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yea, I'm scared too. I heard a woman in church say, "if Hillary get's elected, Jesus will simultaneously come back".
To tell you the truth, I would like to see a woman President, but I was thinking of someone more like Angelina Jolie. Not because she's overwhelmingly beautify, but becasue she's intelligent and caring about people.
2007-02-12 04:23:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No she has not. Her husband was President she was not. She actually had less power than Rosalyn Carter or Nancy Reagan when it came to influencing decisions. Please explain how she blatently manipulated power during the time her husband was President. Since you will not be able to do that I think you are just trying to push buttons to see what response you get. Well you got mine.
By the way Dolly Madison influenced James, Abbigail Adams influenced John, Eleanore Roosevelt, who worked tirelessly for various causes influenced FDR and Mary Lincoln influenced Abe, so it is nothing new.
2007-02-12 04:42:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
This question made me laugh. Yes, she served her term as president. The world has had enough of Hillary. I wish she would just go away.
2007-02-12 04:22:21 · answer #6 · answered by Lori E 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
You question was to the world as it should be. They must think we have snapped. It is time for a major change and Hillary is admired by many world leaders.
2007-02-12 05:03:08 · answer #7 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Like most First Ladies she influenced her husband while he was President.
The difference with that administration is they didn't try to hide it.
Laura Bush is a very intelligent woman and she influences her husband all the time....they just keep it quiet.
2007-02-12 04:23:09 · answer #8 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If Hillary gets elected that will be the moment that America truly dies once and for all.
2007-02-12 04:22:39 · answer #9 · answered by Mr.Robot 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
if ya gotta' have a girl in the oval office, how about condi rice, she is black and a woman, the best of both worlds! plus she is already on board with the haliburton plan for a brave new profit sharing world.
2007-02-12 04:20:58 · answer #10 · answered by wrenchbenderottis 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋