HHR I love the way they look,drive,and feel
2007-02-13 14:52:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Too on the factor of call, and appropriate now i'm incredibly worried approximately help for the two, as GM and Chrysler are as funds-strapped via fact the State of California, actually. The PT Cruiser is the faster layout and the motor vehicle that began the micro-van type; its physique is a scale-down of the 1930's-classic Airflow. It does have some wheelwell intrusion into the interior the place the 0.33 row is placed on the 6-passenger format. The HHR is, in my estimation, a simpler microvan than the PT. Scaled down from the 1947-fifty 4 style 3100 Suburban and Panel Van on the comparable wheelbase via fact the PT, it has no wheelwell intrusion into the interior. maximum HHRs are 4-seaters, with LS and LT trim tiers obtainable; one advertisement variation, the two-seat Panel style, definitely outcarries its eastern opposition the Honda factor and Scion/Toyota xB. The HHR may well be had with a six-velocity Muncie or 4-velocity Hydra-Matic transaxle for its 2.2-litre 4.
2016-10-02 00:33:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the case for these two cars, styling seems to be the main difference. As far as I am concerned the HHR has the edge on styling, evoking the feel of my old 1952 GMC van. The PT Cruiser on the other hand was the leader of the "retro" pack, but seems to be awkward in its styling features.
As far as performance, both are in the "wimpy" range.
2007-02-12 03:58:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by yes_its_me 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Drive them first, next drive something else in the same price range.
2007-02-12 21:34:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dr Phil 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
HHR as well.
2007-02-12 10:40:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are kidding right?
Each one is a huge POS.
2007-02-14 13:55:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by adreed 4
·
0⤊
0⤋