Democrats and Republicans, can we at least agree on one thing...?

Question

that america being attacked on 9/11 has absolutely nothing to do with why we are fighting a war in iraq? i thought this was already covered and put to rest, but some people still say that we were attacked and we need to fight this war. so cant we just agree that the two events have nothing at all in common, and stop using that as evidence in your arguments?

Answer 1

Republicans wont even agree to global warming

Answer 2

Sorry...but I guess I fail to see where you are coming from.
The Bush administration planned and executed 9-11. They needed someone to blame it on. So, they told the American people they wanted to go after the terrorists. They said the terrorists were in Iraq..so therefore...we had to invade it. But in reality IF ther had actually been any Arab terrorists...they would have invaded Saudi Arabia instead, because supposedly, 15 of the 19 (so called) terrorists were from there. So, actually, the government couldn't even get their lies straight!
If you will read the Northwood Papers(uncut version), you will see they used the same logic as on 9-11. This military person wrote "we can take military planes, paint them to look like passenger planes, make fake passenger manifestos. We can blow it out of the sky, then blame it on Cuba. That way we will have an excuse to invade Cuba." That is a quote from the document. And that document was an official one sent to the president during the Cuban missile crisis in the 60s. Those are facts folks. Look them up....IF you can find the whole document. The last time I found them they had been 'altered.' But I have a copy of it before they were chopped up.

Answer 3

Well, that's not quite true. If 9/11 hadn't happened, we would probably not be in Iraq.

But this isn't because we believe Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. It is because once 9/11 occurred, Saddam's resistance to UN inspections, the corruption of the UN oil-for-food program, the increasing belligerence of Saddam, and the mounting evidence of Saddam's relationships with terrorists, it became imperative to eliminate him.

That imperative would probably not have existed without 9/11. But after 9/11, the danger of Saddam's continued WMD programs getting weapons into the hands of terrorists was a threat we dare not let reach the imminent stage, which would be too late.

Yes, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. We've been saying that for 5½ years now. But 9/11 changed how we look at situations and how we evaluate their potential for harm.

Answer 4

a million NO! it incredibly is the way Democrats intend to run inner maximum coverage companies out of enterprise. think of this in the different industry. "I basically wrecked my motor vehicle and it desires $8000 well worth of restoration. can i purchase a $800 a three hundred and sixty 5 days coverage coverage on it NOW and get the paintings completed?" that's insanity and not the way coverage is meant to paintings. There could be an fullyyt separate thank you to handle human beings in this occasion. 2 Agreed. 3. No back. that's a strategies too regularly occurring. it may be abused the two way.

Answer 5

Let's see if we can agree on this too. When we ran Iraq out of Kuwait and Iraq attacked Israel. Is that not true? YES! Did Israel attack Iraq? NO! This was a regime that had to go, and we were in the neighborhood anyway, so why not?

Israel is one of our greatest allies. We should protect her at all costs. Besides, we all know that Israel has nukes and if we didn't protect her, we all know what would happen. A nuclear war is not in the world's best interest.

More....

OH!!!!!!! BigD ask the people in New York if they believe in global warming. 100" of snow in 6 days.....sounds like ice age to me. Tell me....isn't it supposed to get warmer during global warming?

Answer 6

"Khan" has it right! I realize that Saddam didn't cause 9/11, but if you think he didn't support it, you're out of your mind! He and Osama had the same goals for the U.S. and there is NO DOUBT about that! 9/11 was the catalyst to our involvement in the war against terror. Tell the people that were victims of Hussein's reign, that he was not a terrorist! That he had no affiliation with Al Qaida what-so-ever. He sheltered and housed them! Its like this, to put it in words you may understand better; You love FSU, your friend loves Florida...You, for the most part, despise each other, but when it comes to Miami?? You find a common ground; No matter what, Miami is the ultimate evil! Well there you go! Osama, Hussein and the U.S.A. (and the U.K.).

Btw, I hated using FSU in that statement, but its the only analogy I could think of at the moment.

Answer 7

October 10, 2002

Floor Speech of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton
on S.J. Res. 45, A Resolution to Authorize the Use of
United States Armed Forces Against Iraq

..."(Saddam Hussein) .... has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001...."

"he will have maximum incentive to use weapons of mass destruction and to give what he can't use to terrorists who can torment us with them long after he is gone."

http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html
It's a War on Terror

Answer 8

No. There was no financial, political or real advantage to be gained by our response to the attack. The only thing it could have done is make our enemies think twice before attacking us. If we had nuked Iraq, it would have been over, but we would have had to share an even smaller oil supply. We could have shot every Arab we encountered, but that would have punished the innocent for an act of a few. In Iraq, the innocent get blown up as a matter of course by the "Faithful," people who pray to a merciful Allah. Ironic?

Answer 9

True conservatives may agree. Neo-conservatives would rather die than admit to anything of the sort even after GW Bush stated exactly what you are saying following the start of the Iraq war.

Answer 10

Actually, 9/11 does have something to do with war in Iraq(revenge). But why we are "STILL" fighting in Iraq has nothing to do with 9/11 anymore.

Answer 11

Our Congress supports Israel because of the enormous Lobby here in the States which includes the criminal organization AIPAC who either bribes or blackmails our congress members into voting to give Israel BILLIONS of dollars every year. Those congress members who cannot be bought or blackmailed are vilified and/or marginalized by or Zionist controlled media.

Israel is the top dog in American politics. ISRAEL is determining our foreign policy. ISRAEL is putting us in danger. That little piece of **** country that offers NOTHING is isolating us along with it from the entire rest of the world.

Israel is a leech that has attached itself to our spinal cord and has spread its tentacles into our appendages and is acting as our puppet master. America is SERIOUSLY infected by this Zionist parasite and if we don't rid our selves of it, we will surely die.

At least 7 of the 19 "hijackers" are KNOWN to be still alive. Their IDs were stolen. One is a pilot for a Saudi Airline and is even suing the Feds because they continued to show his face as one of the hijackers even though they KNEW it was not true.

The Feds KNOW that at least 7 of the hijacker's identities are in serious doubt, but are doing NOTHING to find out who the REAL culprits are.

I wonder why that is.

Never forget the USS Liberty

Never forget 9/11
-5 dancing Israelis
-Israeli spy ring
-Silverstein – owner if the WTC, Rabid Zionist and best friends with Netanyahu “we pulled the building”
-PNAC – “New Pearl Harbor”
-PNAC – “Getting rid of Saddam is strategically important to ISRAEL”
-AIPAC – criminal organization that bribes and blackmails our “representatives”
-Zionist controlled media that lies to us EVERYDAY and labels any criticism of Israel as Anti-Semitic!