She meets him after he dies because she goes to her old house and to think and leaves a note. Then they write letters, she is really talking to a dead guy. At the end they get together because she saves from the car accident. Basically, they wouldn't have meet if he hadn't died? The movie is like Time Machine only the guy couldn't save his wife from dying.
2007-02-12 03:11:51 · 11 answers · asked by Robin 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
He is dead at the time of her existence!!
2007-02-12 03:27:09 · update #1
There you go, that's the conundrum. She says that because that guy died she went to the lakehouse. If he hadn't have died, she'd never have gone, they never would have met. Of course, he wouldn't have died trying to get to her. Life would have gone on. But the movie would've been pointless.
Time travel is always just so confusing. Harry Potter? Wouldn't have worked. You can't cross a bridge, get to the future, and go back in time to tell yourself to build that bridge so you can cross it. It just doesn't work that way. Kate and Leopold? Also has its problems. Back to the Future might work, as it brings up alternate realities, but again, there are flaws here and there.
2007-02-12 03:25:44 · answer #1 · answered by Lady Ettejin of Wern 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought it was a great movie. She doesnt talk to a dead guy, she saves him from dieing. I guess it takes an intelligent person to understand it.
2007-02-12 03:18:57 · answer #2 · answered by Tatts 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in case you think of like they are thinking, confident. trouble-free to comprehend. Love withstands all issues and would even defeat time. sturdy message. trouble-free and gooey. If, whether, you think of like a rational individual, no. and that i visit argue my case. think of roughly this. the reason she is going back to the Lakehouse, and he or she admits this herself, is by using the fact the guy died, and that have been given her thinking. whilst she realizes that the guy that died grew to become into the guy she's falling in love with, she hurries and prevents him from death. ok... She stops the guy from death. Logically, the destiny then would have replaced. the guy in no way died, she in no way began thinking, she in no way went to the Lakehouse, and he or she in no way met him. So, he would in no way have been interior the possibility interior the 1st place, via fact he grew to become into crossing the line to get to her. yet she gave him the letter that informed him to attend. yet, as you will discover, he waited, he did no longer die, and he or she did no longer flow to the Lakehouse. So. they does no longer finally end up mutually, logically. it is nonetheless a happy ending, and that i'm happy they are happy.
2016-10-02 00:31:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I actually couldn't bring myself to watch the whole movie all the way through. It was too far fetched for me.
2007-02-12 03:14:27 · answer #4 · answered by ~Giggles~ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes this movie doesnt make sense at all!
And again I say,thats what the directer wants! lol
2007-02-12 03:15:34 · answer #5 · answered by Pinky 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah, if you don't think too hard it's a pretty good movie other than that it just hurts my head trying to put all the pieces together. : )
2007-02-12 03:15:00 · answer #6 · answered by Deanna 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah. the movie had a million problems with it. especially when they were frantically writing back and forth to each other with one word responses. but keanu reeves is the one... so i don't want to talk to much **** about him... he'll kill me.
2007-02-12 05:57:22 · answer #7 · answered by eveningdin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I loved it. But I think it was meant to be ironic.
2007-02-12 03:26:10 · answer #8 · answered by Ryeroe 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no thats why i thought it was very stupid. and for people that say its good then they need serious help. and yes i know it was fiction.
2007-02-12 03:23:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yep I believe that's the way it went...great movie. I love Sandra Bullock
the lake house is beautiful...will you buy me it please?
2007-02-12 03:15:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋