Will Democrats Authorize War On Iran Because Of New Evidence?

Question

And then claim that Bush "lied" about the intelligence, even though they themselves saw it and agreed? Will they vote for the war against Iran before they vote against it?

Answer 1

Here's some old thoughts the democrats had and then seem to loose

Answer 2

This just proves that Bush made the wrong choices once again. It is his intelligence that has gotten America in this mess in the first place. I don't believe Bush intelligence, and Democrats aren't imbeciles. A full investigation without Bush supporters will need to be looked at to get to the bottom of the issue. War profiteering and embezzling in Iraq leads to all of this.

Answer 3

They will be against whatever Bush does.

If he engages...they'll call him a war monger.
If he doesn't...they'll say he picked the wrong war (Iraq) over the right one in Iran).
They'll claim his Iraq war allowed Iran to threaten us without fear of retaliation. That might be true, not because of the Iraq war, but because of all those who are opposing it now.

Iran can see the US may not have the resolve to finish the Iraq war...because we all want an overnight win and don't have the patience to see it through to a better Iraq. It will all go for naught.

Answer 4

HOW LUCKY FOR THE US MEDIA THAT THIS BOMB SUPPOSEDLY MADE IN IRAN BEARS ENGLISH MARKINGS
Also, Iran gets its weapons, including mortars, from Russia. Russian mortars do NOT use 81MM rounds! They use 82mm.

AND, Modern Iran uses a solar Hijri calendar that is 621 years less than the Western solar calendar, so if this munition were really made in Iran. the date should read 1385, rather than 2006!


Look in www.whatreallyhappened.com and he has the phot there on his blog :)

Answer 5

Yes they will, we are going to war with Iran then probably the Saudi's & basically the whole middle east. WWIII has already started we the people just don't know it yet. The s**t breaks loose when Hillary Clinton becomes president.

Answer 6

What new evidence? Have we not learned our lessons about the Wolf crying help so many times? Please, if anything, those who were responsible for manipulating info to take us to the Iraq war, should be the ones we ought to be making wars with. We helped put the American-hating Shittes into power by driving out the Sunnis. And who should be so stupid not to have realized that so many Iraqi Shites were exiled and living in Iran during Saddam's Regime. Is it any surprise that they have been bringing in Iranian made weapons into Iraq years ago... probably with the help of Shiite Government members tied to al-Sadr? And to think that the Bushies are only getting paranoid about those weapons now! Where have they been when al-Sadr was strenthening up his anti-American Shiites? Running around building the biggest U.S. Embassy in the world, or busy billing America for reconstruction jobs, or protecting their share of Iraq's oil wealth?

So what? Iran is locking its grips on Iraq? Let those Iraqi neighbors, paranoid about the overflow of bad Shiites into Iraq, handle Iraq themselves. It's their Civil War, not ours. We should pull out and save our own soldiers before they are all returned to us in coffins!

It's time to ask Australia's Howard to shut up? He has no right to speak out against Obama. After all, Australia has sent only 1000 soldiers to Iraq... most of them are NON-combatant soldiers. Boy, oh boy, why are Wolf Blitzer and the Right Wing media honkers avoiding the mention of this? Probably, these Australians in Iraq are merely there to protect Howard's personal share of Iraqi wealth! Oh boy, won't he be worried if U.S. soldiers withdraw from Iraq... and his share of Iraqi Wealth becomes further from his reach!l

Why do our Senators keep allowing our American soldiers be scapegoats for all the Bush Regime's foreign buddies?

By the way, what the Senators had said at Congress during the days leading to vote for the Iraq War, no longer is vital today, knowing that the intelligence was manipulated and Ambassador Wilson's discovery was being clearly stopped from getting into the intelligence findings. The Senators were given deceitful evidence to bring them to their decision making! Goes to show how clever the maniulators of the intelligence are to have drawn up so-called evidence that is full of BS.

Answer 7

There's something called diplomacy. Nixon used it skillfully with Russia and China. Carter used it in the Middle East. It prevents wars. Why is Bush unable to use it?

Answer 8

Even though the evidence is indisputable, they won't vote for war.

Democrats like it when soldiers die in Iraq. It just proves their point about Bush.

I'm glad we can be a source of entertainment for Nancy Pelosi...

Answer 9

I would guess that iran and north korea are on the list of countries who must de-arm themselves or face military consequences.

Answer 10

And they're always slapping Republicans in the face for "repeating history". This is one of those "derr" moments.

And BTW sugarbaby, Hilary supports the theory.