I do he would be great
2007-02-12 02:55:04 · 16 answers · asked by ashkicker420 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
sure, he's an anti-semite, but so is former president Democrat Jimmy Carter, so that shouldn't matter
2007-02-12 03:00:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Read the Constitution. The President has to be born in the Unites States. So Mel is out ans so is the 'Governator'.
2007-02-12 11:14:26 · answer #2 · answered by bugs280 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In my opinion he is a racist bigoted idiot who can act reasonably well in movies. His political opinions are clearly based on racism and hate, and I would cringe to see him run for public office. Just because he is famous does not mean I care what he thinks politically.
2007-02-12 11:03:11 · answer #3 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, he should be President. Of a country, well, no.
2007-02-12 11:01:59 · answer #4 · answered by Venita Peyton 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of what? Alcoholics Anonymous or Jewish College Fund?
2007-02-12 11:03:58 · answer #5 · answered by gaban24 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He wasn't born in the US, therefore he can't be president.
2007-02-12 11:02:39 · answer #6 · answered by Pantherempress 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Thanks timo...I was thinking that he was from there. But I don't keep up with Hollywood stuff...so I thought I might have my facts wrong. Nope....he can't be president.
2007-02-12 11:05:35 · answer #7 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of Australia... Yeah what the hell, why not?
Here? No... No I don't! We have enough problems as it is!
2007-02-12 11:03:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That drunken anti semitic b@stard? He would be even worse than Bush.
2007-02-12 10:59:03 · answer #9 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
he definately would be better than hussein obama as president of the US
2007-02-12 10:58:27 · answer #10 · answered by flyboy7683 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋