What are your thoughts on the sex offender registry?

Question

in terms of legality, invasion of privacy and the safety factors it provides. Be as thorough as possible.

If your not sure what this is, the most popular one can be found here: http://www.familywatchdog.us/

Answer 1

When I think of sex offender registry, I am reminded of how innacurate the charge actually is. Many times is it simply numbers, such as the case of Genarlow Wilson, who at 17 had sexual relations with a 15 year old girl. Even though she was less than one year from being classified as "over the age of consent" and he was less than 3 years older, he is serving 10 years in prison and will be classified as a sex offender for life.
The letter of the law says it was "aggrivated child molestation" even though it was apparently consentual. The spirit of the law was apparently intended to keep 35 year old men from molesting 15 year old girls. The idea of tracking sex offenders is not punishing children for being children.

Was he wrong? Yes, even without being charged but was his action worthy of a life-time sentence of being barred from certain occupations, on-line websites (such as MySpace), having to register with the police wherever he lives as well as being forbidden from living within a certain distance of a school, and having to tell his future girl friends or wife about his past?

Contrast this with:
Margaret De Barraicua was a thirty-year old woman who had sex with a 16 year old boy. She pled guilty to fourt counts of felony statuatory rape. Her sentence: 1 year.
Nicole Barnhart, a 35 year old woman had sex with a 16 year old boy. Sentenced to 2 years in prison and 10 years probation as a sex offender.
Joan Marie Sladky, 28. Sentenced to 6 months in county jail for having sex with a 16-year-old student after pleading no contest to four counts of unlawful sexual intercourse, oral copulation and penetration with a foreign object.

I have long suspected that the charge of "sex offender" is another anti-male bias urged by feminists to punish men. Given the rash of adult women being charged with sexual assault on boys but serving little or no time compared to men, I can only shake my head at the hypocrisy.

I would agree to a sex offender base but only if it is used correctly to track violent offenders or predators. Tracking teen-age consential sex will do nothing but make it inefficient and cumbersome and in the end, a joke.

Answer 2

I actual have not checked mine and that i stay in the city the position Joan's regulation become inspired. it is compared to i am going to do some thing efficient with the understanding i'd income from the registry. i'm actually no longer going to drop my preserve over my little ones if there aren't any listings in my section. So all i am going to do with the documents is worry too a lot, worry too little, or get indignant and do some thing stupid so whats the point? Plus - i'm no longer fairly efficient I consider the theory. i'm extremely efficient a minimum of one million individual, someplace, has been positioned upon one among those lists wrongly. i won't be able to work out how the lists can help everybody so all they can do is harm. Catcher: Hmm - turn through the images - perchance there is a few factor to it - yet nonetheless, isn't an unknown face purely as risky as one we see on the itemizing?

Answer 3

I am not sure how effective it really can be . . . if someone moves into your neighborhood and they are a sex offender, unless everyone is informed then it won't do much good. If they move to a city they have the relative anonymity that comes with being a part of a large population. It does invade the privacy of the offenders, but they have alrwady committed crimes that can't be repaired, so that's not much of an issue for me. I just don't know if it as effective as it sounds like it could be.

Answer 4

It's merely another measure by an increasingly paranoid society to take rights away from citizens in the name of "safety." I really love how people expect former criminals to reintegrate into society after serving their sentence, but at the same time make it nearly impossible for them to find a well-paying job and live a normal life. If you're going to be treated like a criminal even after you've paid your debt to society, why bother trying to be an asset? The idiocy of some people is mind-boggling.

On top of that, people seem to have an incredibly skewed idea of what a "sex offender" is. It doesn't always mean rape or child molestation. If you're caught taking a leak behind a dumpster, you could be labeled a sex offender. If a child sees you do it, they could tack on (seriously) child molestation charges. You'll be considered a child rapist for the rest of your life because you were too drunk to make it to a bathroom.

Those who are willing to trade their freedom for security deserve neither.

Answer 5

I think it is a scam by the government to lower property values for lower income people to move in. It took my neighbor three years to sell their property because the lady on the other side is on the registry and is forced to have a large red and white sign on her front yard.

Answer 6

Any registry like this is only as good as the system but also the publics access to it and their likelihood to use it. It is a great tool, unfortunately, like everything else, we get the tool and eventually get bored and don't use it. People with small children should be scouring their neighborhood registries every day but, we know better. They are too busy raising their children. A neighborhood watch is always good to get someone different checking the lists everyday and sharing with the group.

Answer 7

Criminal Record Search Database : http://InfoSearchDetective.com

Answer 8

I think it should be a national database rather than state based. I'm just sick of giving more rights to people who have committed crimes. All law abiding people have a right to know if a sick, perverted, harmful person is living in their neighborhood.

Answer 9

I think it is a waste of taxpayer money

I think, once someone is convicted of a sex crime, they should never leave prison. I can't see one reason they benefit society by walking the streets.

Whenever there is a sex crime, who do they look for first? Convicted sex offenders! Doesn't this tell us something?

Answer 10

It is a very valuable resource. When you are convicted of a crime you loose some of your rights.