2007-02-12 02:32:15 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
Do you think that you're questions would be better if you had a cricket bat rammed up your @r$e?
2007-02-12 03:01:43 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Ashes series from 2005 was some of the most exciting sport I've ever watched - it was amazing & I'm not really a cricket fan.
2007-02-12 02:37:42 · answer #2 · answered by Jay A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think cricket would be more exciting if they used a cricket instead of a cricket ball.
2007-02-12 02:34:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sounds like you have the brain not larger than the size of a cricket bail(s).
2007-02-12 04:24:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Judging by the present level of play with the England team, do you think the players will be able to actually hit the balL, will it be large enough?
2007-02-12 02:43:13 · answer #5 · answered by Social Science Lady 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
And they had goals instead of stumps. And played on a larger field and had goalkeepers and kicked the ball instead of throwing it. And if they played the game over 90 minutes.
That would be good.
2007-02-12 02:37:34 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dumbest question ever related to Cricket ....
2007-02-12 02:37:46 · answer #7 · answered by Teejay 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
cricket is exciting, test matches CAN drag on sometimes, but try your local team as they have a 1 day match, great fun.
2007-02-12 02:34:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
congratulations.........you've managed to get 'cricket' and 'exciting' in the same sentence.
2007-02-12 02:35:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
lol! football is great and all but it can only do so much. i think it would still be pretty lame;)
2007-02-12 02:36:14 · answer #10 · answered by *Kisses* 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋