more just and peaceful to any measurable extent, all else being equal? I think I know the answer for myself, but I'm curious what others might think. WHy, or why not?
2007-02-12 02:01:12 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Women and men can be equally as inept at politics and dealing with people.
I used to think that a woman would be a better, kinder,more fair leader but after Maggie Thatcher .........I rest my case!!
I would prefer a Jimmy Carter to her any day.
Thats just my opinion.
2007-02-12 02:11:27 · answer #1 · answered by curious 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The World is in an uproar. It needs Peace, I think a Woman President Like Hilary Clinton is just what it might need. When growing up who was the peace giver in the Family...Mom...The Clinton Years before was at least Peaceful and a lot Happier time. I think Hilary Clinton is what the world needs...Sorry, but I think She would make a great Peace maker & solve the economy...
2007-02-12 02:13:34 · answer #2 · answered by Jean f 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I as a women would love to see a women take office, i would like to see a person of color in office as well, change is what this country needs. However as a us soldier, i have to say a women in power, would result in other countries, who see women as a lesser person, viewing us a lesser nation. this might result in peace talks, being denied, or transactions between governments, more tight mouthed. I especially dont want to see a women in power till this war is over.
2007-02-12 02:09:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it would make a great deal of difference. Women thrust into such roles have performed well but their countries have sort of gone on along in the same general course as before. Research Golda Meir, Indira Gandhi, Mrs Thatcher, the woman in Indonesia (?) and several others to see if they actually changed the general historical direction of their country. It would be wonderful to have a woman in the USA with such attributes as many of these, but due to the existing world conditions and the temporary nature of the Presidential terms I doubt they would have a truly significant impact that would cause real change.
2007-02-12 02:11:25 · answer #4 · answered by Nightstalker1967 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Well...in America, there is no difference between men and women; even biologically. I see Americans, but I really can't know who are the males and who are the females. All are hermaphrodites...even sexually, all are mounted and all like to be the negative.
So why in politics are you really worried about a woman becoming a president? Remember that she might turn out to be a man in the end. Even the most speciallized person can't differentiate between an American man and an American woman. They're exactly the same.
2007-02-12 02:11:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think it would be awesome to have a woman president. It would be different, and different is good. A change that I am willing to experience. She would make our world a better place. Less prejudice towards women, and more equal rights..
2007-02-12 02:12:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Yes, a woman would do a great job as a President. We need a change, since men have ****** this world up as it is.
2007-02-12 02:33:20 · answer #7 · answered by precious_jules81 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Things would be worse. Every month the "President" would want to drop a bomb on a country because of PMS. Women are too emotional to lead a nation.
2007-02-12 02:11:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Put a woman in office and you americans will be going to war once a month, rather than the once a year you already have.
2007-02-12 02:14:32 · answer #9 · answered by rob b 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Certainly. Women are intutive and different from men. They gave a human feeling more than men.
2007-02-12 02:06:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anuj P1952 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋