According to the present situation, after big bang, the matter continued to expand and still it is expanding with a great velocity. And we have no capacity to see the ending of the universe. So let us hope there would such technology come into existence and we can see the ends of the universe
2007-02-14 21:27:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥ ΛDIƬΥΛ ♥ ııllllııllıı 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Universe is endless.
Our tiny minds cannot get a handle on its size,
so we try to give it shapes and boundaries, all of which is folly.
====================
The “Big Bang” is abstract hypothesis.
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”.
It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”.
The answer is :
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
* * *
Once there was a “Big Bang”.
But in what space had the Big Bang taken place
and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?
Not in T=0K?
It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.
Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is
in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease.
What temperature can this radiation reach?
Not T=0K?
Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,
we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K.
===== ========
About the theory of the “Big Bang” is written the thick (very thick) books.
But anywhere do not write about the reason of the “Big Bang”.
Anybody does not know it.
I know.
Action, when the God opens his palm,
have named the “Big Bang”.
And action, when the God compresses his palm,
have named " a single point”.
===========================
http://www.socratus.com
2007-02-12 17:30:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by socratus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The universe is a dynamic evolving,finite entity.
You could compare it to a hurricane.
It starts as the motion of a few molecules of air,roars into an incredible maelstrom,then fades and goes out of existence.
2007-02-12 09:35:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Billy Butthead 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well......not really. Universe will have to end if the theory of big crunch is correct. However it will not happen for another billions of years.
2007-02-12 09:03:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by cosmos 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
this universe is going 2 come to an end on judgement day. doomsday!!
2007-02-12 09:45:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by frost 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
we can't predict ,but as per the recent results we can just say that universe is expanding .any thing that expands defiantly it has end.[we can just predict only
as per till todays research]
2007-02-12 09:22:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If u want to know the truth..
Universe is endless, boundless, timeless........ but not lifeless
2007-02-13 14:21:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by amitanshu_vishal 2
·
0⤊
0⤋