Given the tremendous amount of life being lost to the civilian population?

Question

in Iraq, wouldn't it make more sense to create a small neighborhood say at a corner of four square blocks, surround it with a wall, allow no one to leave, and bring in food supplies to them, rather than allow people to head into open markets where terrorists can set off powerful bombs? The military can check out each person to make sure they are not a terrorist. They could also set up a school in their for children. They could create a safe mosque. As they make a neighborhood 'secure' they could expand. It seems like a safer alternative over seeing 70 to 150 or more innocent people killed each week. Why hasn't the U.S. military considered this? At this point, allowing people to walk around is not an option any longer. It's too dangerous. With a small compound, they might better secure it from rock and grenade attacks, too. Granted, this might smack in the face of Democracy U.S. style, but shouldn't life be more important for the moment over flag-waving politics?

Answer 1

Are you talking about prisons? ghettos?

Safe? Have you ever heard of mortars?

Answer 2

the position ought to one initiate with their answer? In such an fairly volatile area, with differing interests to boot, the attitude that you advise will be very confusing to easily initiate. Then there is the problem of coping with the type of project and ultimately that is mission. in the present day, that is because of "flag waving politics" that our attempt is basically too ablate quite than pointed. there is too a lot occurring in the present day with our overseas coverage in route of this conflict with the present elections, and the drawing near presidential elections on the horizon would have that is effect on how we proceed. Your concept is smart, yet because the international is, it may well be confusing to promote any undemanding experience to anybody at the same time as they are so deeply in contact with the conflict.