The 2 theories of universe are contradictory."Big Bang " and the "Steady state" Which is true

Question

Big bang theory gives details that our universe had a beginning and will have an end. Where as steady stae states that there is no end and beginning for the universe.

Answer 1

if one were true, then the other would be false. then, only ONE of them would be a theory
both are based on different principles and observations, u can't say one is right and one is wrong
(I tend to agree with the Big Bang Theory)

Answer 2

They are two different theories. The Steady State theory has been superseded by the Big Bang as the most accepted theory.
They are both still, however, theories and scientists are still working on the best explanation from several theories. A new mystery they are incorporating into the mix is the fact that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, which was unexpected...

Answer 3

The Universe is endless.
Our tiny minds cannot get a handle on its size,
so we try to give it shapes and boundaries, all of which is folly.
====================
The “Big Bang” is abstract hypothesis.
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”.
It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”.
The answer is :
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
* * *
Once there was a “Big Bang”.
But in what space had the Big Bang taken place
and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?
Not in T=0K?
It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.
Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is
in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease.
What temperature can this radiation reach?
Not T=0K?
Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,
we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K.
===== ========
About the theory of the “Big Bang” is written the thick (very thick) books.
But anywhere do not write about the reason of the “Big Bang”.
Anybody does not know it.
I know.
Action, when the God opens his palm,
have named the “Big Bang”.
And action, when the God compresses his palm,
have named " a single point”.
===========================
http://www.socratus.com

Answer 4

No one gives any credence to Steady State these days. Fred Hoyle coined the term "Big Bang" to disparage the theory as he favoured the Steady State hypothesis but he realised that SS was wrong as all the evidence supported BB.

Theory is as good as it gets in science. There is nothing "only" about a scientific theory,

Answer 5

The Big Bang theory is that the universe as we know it began billions of years ago when a tiny 'particle' that contained all the energy-mass of our universe exploded. Much of the energy was converted to particles, and these particles combined to form stars, galaxies of stars, planets, and other massive objects. The result of the explosion is the expansion of the universe.

In the Steady State theory it is expounded that the universe had no beginning and will continue as it is forever. Matter is created continuously to fill voids left as the universe expands. (It doesn't take much matter to be created, as big as the universe is.)

Problems with the BB Theory? Well, to start, where did the original "egg" come from? Why is the universe accelerating? (I think I can answer that one...the acceleration we see is simply the faster velocity of very old objects (which are moving faster than projected), and the "dark matter" (whatever THAT is) is slowing the universe down more than projected. But it still isn't enough to make it collapse.

Is the universe more spread out now than, say 5 billion years ago? Who knows? I think it is thining out with time, which is one proof that the Steady State isn't working. Matter is created in rare circumstances (out of energy), but not enough to fill in the gaps.

My money is placed on the Big Bang, but it has a long way to go to explain many important ideas.

Answer 6

Big Bang theory is absurd in many ways. Think about the giant mass that took blast that time ??? against tremendous Gravitational pull.
That blast scattered the matter into so fine pieces that the order of Electron & Proton ???? No piece scattered of the same material as of original mass.
Big Bang does not explain how new Galaxies are forming ??
Whereas Steady State Theory seems to be logical .
Michelson Morley Experiment only disagrees with any medium that St. St. Theory assumes.

Answer 7

The new scientific theory is that matter and energy are interchangeable, there is much more of the universe that is undetectable by our senses and measurements, physical laws in other regions of space, especially gravitational forces, may differ from ours, and of coarse numerous other physical dimensions hidden from our view! The Big Bang 'theory' has since been over shadowed by brilliant yet bizarre new idea's.

Answer 8

Steady state died at least 20 years ago. Even Fred Hoyle who was one of the co-invetors admitted that years ago. You need to get some new books.

Answer 9

Big Bang has been more widely accepted theory. Again they are both theories still and scientists are yet to figureout the truth!

Answer 10

Bigbang theory is the right one because it is taking place usually