He went off on a way too anti war rant, was he trying to out do Hillary? was he just trying to woo the anti war crowd, or is a he protecting what some percieve (myself included) to be his "real Brothers"?
2007-02-11 21:55:29 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
yes we know his real name but the movie lends itself so well to this "clown"
2007-02-11 22:05:42 · update #1
I think he took too many lessons from Sharpton and Jackson and we don't need those militant types in office. And the fact that he is Islamic is scary to many and also Jackson who negotiated with Qadafi? hmmmm? This is not going to be an African conquest with an Islamic at the helm, trust me, if that happended there will be a real civil war and plenty of bloodshed. He is very typical from that era? And he should follow the guidelines of a neutral zone not a radical one. People are sick and tired here of the radical militant black issues. sincerely they are and that is not a put down it is constructive criticism. He needs to stop glorifying himself in the limelight, like the rap artists? He will be famous enough without trying to prove something. He must show us he is stable and so far he has not and he won't get that in just two years. Give him 10 years and we will see how he fairs in Washington, whether he will turn corrupt? Or what his hidden agendas are because we all have them? but are they good for the public, and that is the question. Not to vote for a Token, by the way that is all he is right now is a token and no better than that until he proves himself to everyone. Sure the Black people that voted for him are rallying around because they think they are winning something for themselves and not all the Americans and that is a shame, that is why Reagan brought the Mexicans here because they are grateful to be here. The blacks have been so busy fighting whitey they forgot that the subject was to be an American, and team together and win over big businesses and crooked politicians. so now look at us and they all can blame themselves, because it is not about making this a black conquest in our country and it wasn't with Martin Luther King either and he would be rolling in his grave right about now! It is about freedom and living as a team and that is all. amen bubba.
2007-02-11 22:07:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I checked out the link, that show sounds interesting, but from what I've read there it didn't turn out to be in the favour of Islam, did it? The volunteers weren't really cooperative, now were they? That tells us a little something about it, I guess. Personally, I think it's ridiculous to call Britain anti-social. That is so untrue. As for alcohol, promiscuity, gambling and so on, it happens in every society and it is a big problem which needs to be solved, but I'm not sure that Islam is a solution to those. Take a look at Turkey, for example, which is a secular state. I have NEVER in my life come across more people consuming alcohol as I've seen in Turkey. If it doesn't work in a 50-50 country, then how is it supposed to work elsewhere? Turning Britain into Iran or Afghanistan is out of the question and it will never happen. The true answer to those problems is in people themselves and in country's government, not in a religion. .
2016-05-24 00:18:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you make outrageous statements you make yourself look like an idiot. You have outdone yourself here. How uttlerly prejudice and ignorant of you.
You, like most of middle america and the rest of the uninformed, uneducated people, are making generalizations about people who practice Islam. That particular sect that Islam is extreme. In the Koran, Mohammed was a peaceful man and expected all of his brethern to be.
I suppose you listen to Rush Limbaugh, the hypocite and Bill O'Reilly, the guy who suggested that Sean Hornbeck enjoyed his being kidnapped and sexually abused. That wouldn't suprise me.
Perhaps you should do your research before your come to conclusions like this. Just because one has a middle eastern name doesn't mean they are an islamic fascist.
Stay with the flock and listen to the shepard! BAAAAA!
2007-02-11 23:36:11 · answer #3 · answered by Jenn R 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh come on. This war is already lost.
It would be sillier Obama giving a PRO war rant. I wish you well out there, but our forces are now stuck in the middle of a civil war in Iraq that does not present good options.
The omens are not good.
What kind of victory are we going to achieve anyway?
In a way this is worse that Vietnam.
2007-02-11 23:49:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The world would be a better place if all politicians advocated anti-war. War is good for nobody. Obama is right. If America stops being a war monger, we'll all be happy. By the way hatred for war is also hatred for all terrorism.
2007-02-11 22:06:30 · answer #5 · answered by Dolphin 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There's no such person as Borrat Obama. If you can't even get his name right, how can *anyone* assume that you know anything else? Post again once you're emotionally out of grade school.
2007-02-11 21:59:27 · answer #6 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Its politics, so lay off the steele reserve will ya?
2007-02-11 22:21:20 · answer #7 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Who the heck is "Borrat Obama"???
Getting your basic facts right is a good first step toward not looking like a fool.
2007-02-11 21:58:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Senator Hussein Obama bin Laden is an enemy who walks amongst us. Beware!
2007-02-11 22:01:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes, his anti-war sentiment makes him look anti-war
2007-02-11 21:59:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋