AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+, 2400 MHz
Intel® Core(TM) 2 Duo E6400 2.13 GHz
Intel® Core(TM) 2 Duo E6300 1.86 GHz
Intel® Pentium® D 945 3.4 GHz, 2x2 Mb c., LGA 775, BUS 800 MHz, Presler, EM64T, Dual Core, BOX
?????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
do enybody has page with true benchmark list for desktop???
(like notebookcheck for laptops)
2007-02-11 20:33:23 · 4 answers · asked by juretherebel 1 in Computers & Internet ➔ Hardware ➔ Desktops
www.tomshardware.com
I have used this for comparison before. Don't know Tom, but I like his site.
Stay away from AMD - never had luck with them.
2007-02-11 20:43:22 · answer #1 · answered by Aikideshi 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am currently building my own computer and I have been comparing all these processors. I think the E6400 is the best, however you can probably get the same performance overclocking the E6300. These are definitely better than the 4600+. However I don't know much about the 945 so I cant say for sure regarding that although I would imagine the difference between the 945 and E6300 will depend on what you use it for e.g. running programs in parrallel vs. gaming (945 is better for gaming).
2007-02-13 08:18:20 · answer #2 · answered by jamezeo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the AMD is more superior from what you show. intel D's are average level processors. the core duo's are pretty good like the AMD. the only problem with it is the 64bit are still pretty new and not a whole lot of things out there yet for them. i'm an AMD guy but actually i would go with the E6400 here. hate ti turn the AMD down but i am .
2007-02-11 20:57:44 · answer #3 · answered by gas_indycar 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm, I have NEVER had a problem with AMD...like I have with Intel.
You will probably here it back and forth on this one.
2007-02-11 20:51:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋