Unlike what the one guy said Iranians are arabs they are not Arabs they are Persians, they Look different Speak another Language and typically hated each other for eons. Like some Arabs the Iranians are Shiite while the majority of Arabs are Sunni. The majority of Iraqis are Sunni. You will find Saudi arabia supporting the Sunni and Iran supporting the Shiite and the Kurds getting the shaft. Whoever would win will claim the 4th largest Oil reserve and be able to Buy some real good WMD's. For all those that claim Iraq never had them.... well thay will have them again and this time perhaps downtown Atlanta or San Fran may get to see an IED up close.
2007-02-11 21:26:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Iran, Iraq, belong to the same Republic, the United Arab Republic get it? There are 21 countries, Saudi is the chief oil barrons and the Kuwaitis are second, and on down like the Cast system they live by depicts. Libya and Syria are members and Egypt and Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkey, etc.. Follow so far? They are all the enemy with Russia backing them all since right after WW II! the war never ended! The third Reich went under ground after Hitlers death and there was a parlay deal with the Nazi's and the communists then because they both had a common interest, over throwing the Americans get it yet? Just because the wall came down does not mean they are not still the enemy, along with the many Euro trash members as well as France, etc.????
This is not so small minded as two little squawty countries! Saudi just made a big business deal brokering with Palestinians watch the news reports on that issue? eh? And then the Chinese to boot are engaging in business in Africa? We are in for one hell of a War and soon! Surround your wagons bubba we are surrounded! Our only hope is the Christian Hispanics right as of now! And please don't depend on the Euro trash from Canada they have smuggled the Arabs through French Quebec forever and a day! Canada is a greedy self serving money grubbing country on both sides.BC sold out to the Chinese and the French is a mish mosh pirate group of mixed Euro trash and Arabs, along with Russians, forever infiltrators all of them! Toronto and Montreal look up their populas? www.history.com look at the Arab mosques up there? Duh? There aren't any in Mexico eh?
2007-02-11 21:09:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
confident, and that's not purely a droop, yet your President would desire to have considered that earlier he destroyed Iraq and assassinated Saddam. Did he and his oil-robbing cronies (and his lapdog, best Minister Blair) forget that the reason the u . s ., alongside with the united kingdom and different ecu international places, presented Saddam with all the palms and help he asked for following the exodus of the Shah from Iran replace into to stand up to that very risk, that have been on the enjoying cards yet thereby effectively countered via Saddam, ever provided that that factor? there is now no way that Iraq on my own would desire to take care of itself against Iran and, given the international condemnation of the disastrous Iraq invasion and occupation fiasco, that's now especially unlikely that the u . s . would desire to get the international help it is going to require to invade Iran. All of this facilitates Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to proceed to pursue Iran's nuclear objectives with an air of coverage he would, possibly, by no potential in any different case have had, attributable to you, in u.s. and to us, in Britain. United, as unswerving allies, we f*cked it up thoroughly. Bloody idiots!
2016-11-03 05:32:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
most likely neither...
the simple fact is that there are only very small numbers of al-queda terrorists in the country, far too few to take the nation or the oil over... defense intel estimates the number of terrorists in Iraq at around 1,300... out of millions of Iraqis...
and if Iran attacked, we would clearly go back... in what would basically be Korea situation...
you really have no factual basis for either that you can cite or find...
2007-02-11 20:42:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Iran will never get it and neither Al-Quiada.
2007-02-11 22:35:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran already has a huge stake in this because of all the money and contracts they've pumped in there. Good, let them have it. We have our own resources here. Congress just keeps blocking exploration, that's all. Americans have to get them to 'lighten up.'
2007-02-11 21:44:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by chole_24 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
How exactly will Al Queda refine thousands of tons of crude oil???
Idiot
By the way, Al Queda is a division of BushCo., so if Bush doesn't get it, Al Queda certainly wont either.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
2007-02-11 21:00:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Iraq will claim it, like it should be, not american and british oil companies banking the profit. Al queada? are you serious? They have maybe 1,000 people in Iraq if you believe that lie anyways, I seriously doubt 1,000 people are going to take anything from 28 million.
2007-02-11 20:38:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by 33 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
if Iran is not prepared to give the oil to US without a fight.. do you think their gonna surrender that easily to alqaidah??..
2007-02-12 00:29:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kyo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
How about the Iraqis?
2007-02-11 23:56:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋