I work with a bunch of teenagers and it seems like most of them only have the vaguest idea of history - even from just the last 100 years. For example, tonight we were talking about Stalin, Russia, and the cold war, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and they basically were giving me a blank stare. I mentioned the McCarthy hearings and the best I could get was "I've heard of that" but no idea what it was about or the context.
I've gotten responses like this to a number of different of different topics. It makes me wonder if schools are basically glossing over these events in history class or if I was the exception in actually finding these things interesting and learning about them. Maybe I just think it's important because I actually grew up in the last half of the cold war and so it has meaning to my life.
2007-02-11
20:18:09
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Justin H
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
Bret, I agree with the idea of leaving an analysis or interpretation of history until you are older so you have a stronger foundation in many different areas to help you understand events. But I think it's critical that people leaving high school at least know the significant events in history - especially recent history. I don't expect the average high school kid to know WHY the Cuban Missile Crisis happened, but I do expect them to know what it was.
2007-02-11
21:00:43 ·
update #1