English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The way the political outfit of CPI(M) is handling events in West Bengal, it seems that their relevance needs to be seriously questioned. Agriculture is not prosperous anymore to Government, so they want manufacturing in, for which farmers have to be evicted. Isn't service sector more suitable than manufacturing, and aren't the virtual services more "profitable" than their contempories ? TATAs have a legacy of improving production after lowering workers. How can People's car project be an exclusion ? TATAs can incorporate Peoples Car with existing assembly lines, why aren't they doing this ? Most of the advisors to W Bengal government are economists and so are their rulers. How do they come to conclusion that their party can do without support of common citizens ? Has CPI(M) become another corporate ?

2007-02-11 20:00:04 · 2 answers · asked by doxa 2 in News & Events Current Events

2 answers

ya dude you are absolutely write

2007-02-11 20:12:54 · answer #1 · answered by monu 2 · 0 0

Are you suggesting that the evicted farmers could be diverted to service sector...? You seem to be against manufacturing sector for some reasons and there are reasons like that for every alternate idea... That farmers are losing in agriculture is not a reason to give up agriculture... we are still far from manufacturing food economically from factory... The farmers could perhaps be employed elsewhere, but where will food come from..? Definitely service sector can not produce food or pay taxes to the extent of subsidising food..!

That the communists have reverted to strategies opposed by themselves - right from Chinese revisionists to Indian Bengalis - is itself highly relevent... in the economic and political sense... No dogma would hold forever... People have to choose what is relatively advantageous to a particular situation and not hang on to the ideological solutions always... To this extent the Bengal formula is relevent..

But the Tata affair can be argued from different angles but the Bengal govt can not be blamed as anti-farmer, they will never be anti labour even if they drift to what may be called the capitalist approach for lifting their overall state economy..

It is simply politics - nay revenge - to pay the fellows (communists) in their own coin (in the same way they used to harass other governments in similar occassions!)... The message is very clear to neutral citizens though you appear to be emotional having evidently been influenced by some argument of the antagonist experts... You can become equally emotional after reading the articles of the protagonist experts too... All in the game, sir!

2007-02-11 21:02:45 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers