English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

It depends on your league scoring, but in most cases I would say Billups/Nash. They combine for 37.3 pts, 19.6 asts, .8 rbs, 88% ft, 48% fg and 43.5 3pt. Kidd/Arenas combine for 43.3 pts, 15.4 asts, 9 rbs, 81.5% ft, 42.5% fg and 35.5% 3pt. If you need to raise your scoring and boards, go with Kidd/Arenas, but overall, the percentages are too important to overlook.

2007-02-12 04:15:47 · answer #1 · answered by Dizzle 1 · 0 0

Arenas/Kidd: Arenas gets huge point numbers. Kidd won't get as many assists as Nash but he will have a ton more rebounds. In my opinion, Nash is better than Kidd but Arenas is so much better than Billups that it makes up the difference plus some.

2007-02-12 04:13:47 · answer #2 · answered by holbrpa 2 · 0 0

I would go with arenas and kidd, just because arenas is a phenomenal point scorer while still getting a nice amount of assists. kidd is just bananas, 400+ boards and assists from your pg is crazy.

Of course nash does get a crazy amount of assists as well, but he doesnt get too many boards and scores maybe a little more than kidd. billups is good too, but i just dont think hes the same caliber as the other three guys.

and if you add the stats up, pts,rbs,asts, the arenas/kidd combo takes pts and rbs, and barely, barely loses in asts. arenas and kidd would also win in steals and 3's

2007-02-11 20:04:36 · answer #3 · answered by Mat 2 · 1 0

I'd go with Arenas/Kidd because Arenas gives you all of the points you need, plus a few assists and Kidd can dish out assists just as good as Nash.

2007-02-11 21:09:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Billups/Nash: both have playoff experience one has at least 1 ring. Nash is injured right now so think about a back-up that has the minutes/production on the court.

Arenas/Kidd: both give you 100% playing time and their production is key to their squads. overall these are scoring point-guards (shoot-first pass-second). Typically if they don't score they lead the team in assist. Teams like to key on them so they have to beat teams with the pass. The only problem with these guys are they don't know who will step up (consistently) from game to game.

I would go with Nash/Billups they have championship potential written all over them.

2007-02-12 03:18:17 · answer #5 · answered by Coach Snead 1 · 0 1

well is matter what kind scoring league ur in but i wouuld have to go with arena and kidd because u can get assits, rebounds from kidd and arena u can get points ft% and fg% out of him so pretty much a good duo

2007-02-12 03:30:57 · answer #6 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

No contest Billups / Nash. These 2 guys know how to run an offense, they are pass firts point guards who keep their best shots for crunchtime.

2007-02-12 04:24:36 · answer #7 · answered by frigon_p 5 · 0 0

BILLUPS/NASH NASH IS THE MVP TO BE EVEN THOUGH ARENAS AND KIDD ARE GOOD

2007-02-12 01:26:02 · answer #8 · answered by killin pass 1 · 0 1

before everything, Paul George is a SG i think of CP3 and KD would be a perilous blend. CP3 and LeBron would additionally be solid, yet i think of CP3 would be greater efficient with KD via fact he's greater of a seize and shoot participant while LeBron is greater efficient with the ball in his palms.

2016-11-03 05:28:39 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers