English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-11 18:07:03 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

9 answers

Pretty similar. It's harder to feel sorry for a fish. Hunting you only need a gun and bullets, maybe camo clothes or duck calls. Fishing you have several rods and reels, hundreds of lures, leaders, sinkers, bobbers, downriggers etc. Usually a boat. Unless you're lucky both sports you need to travel to get where you want to be. It's more acceptable to drink and fish, booze and guns are a no-no, but hunting camp is another story. I don't believe in trophys in either, but think it's OK if what you get is treated with respect and makes it to the table. Hunters and fishermen are as a rule the best conservationists and respecters of the environment. Some people think it's a sin to hunt deer, but don't know they'll overpopulate an area and die from disease and starvation if not kept in check - their "natural" predators like wolves are no longer around. People who live in the country understand all this, "cityots" who think food comes from supermarket gods don't. And they're both fun. :o)

2007-02-11 18:24:01 · answer #1 · answered by Crash 7 · 1 0

i'm no longer against looking or fishing. via fact biblical cases, people have been looking and fishing "for nutrition". Now, additionally....... i'm against skinning an animal for the fur in basic terms, or for ivory. A "trophy" project would not make experience to me the two. this is unquestionably incorrect and it upsets me deeply! My son-in-regulation is a hunter and fisherman for the "nutrition" in basic terms. He made the main spectacular venison taco's that I on no account concept i might ever appreciate....yet did. So, he hunts for the main suitable reasons. additionally 2nd...........If we did no longer have looking "for the main suitable reasons of course" animals interior the wild might land up killing one yet another for nutrition, nonetheless some already do. yet, they might do greater of it via overcrowding. So, i'm able to work out the reasoning why there's a looking season, as against a non-looking season. There are regulations in many states for looking cases of the year. the belief of interest fishing annoys me very lots! I watched it being executed, and that's senseless to me. Why seize a fish, positioned them decrease than the hook, and then launch them?? Makes unquestionably NO experience to me. yet, who am I? What do i be conscious of? perhaps i've got in simple terms no longer been given a physically powerful reasoning why that's complete. So, those are my perspectives on the two concerns. Have a physically powerful day, from Pilot and that i.

2016-12-17 07:58:43 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Not really -- cause when you go hunting you can easily end up being the game

2007-02-11 18:33:03 · answer #3 · answered by Lolitta 7 · 1 0

I don't think so myself. In hunting, you are the seeker of your target. In fishing, you just wait for the bait to bring your target to you.

2007-02-11 18:12:28 · answer #4 · answered by Antny 5 · 1 0

no - in hunting you squirm along on the floor like a maggot - creeping up on a defensless animal.

in fishing you stick the maggot on a hook and sit around drinking beer.

2007-02-11 18:41:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Totally different.

2007-02-11 18:15:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes and no. Patience is required in both though.

2007-02-11 18:18:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

the end result is the same.

2007-02-11 18:20:50 · answer #8 · answered by nathan c 2 · 1 0

only if you'r using hand grenades

2007-02-11 18:36:14 · answer #9 · answered by pyledriver 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers