1. Malleus Maleficarum, the methodology for the persecution of women and also the philosophical basis for seeing women as inferior. A nasty book, that caused thousands of deaths and centuries of oppression of women everywhere.
2. The Communist Manifest, the ideas of class warfare come from there, and gave the foundation for eternal class confrontation and struggle, opening the way for communism as an independent form of political structure, beyond socialism.
3. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Sion. A book about a worldwide conspiracy by Jews to have absolute power over everybody else. The mother of all conspiracy theories, with strong racist tones.
4. Mein Kampf. Hitler's main book, expounding the theory of Aryan superiority and the right to genocide, plus "Might is Right" as a valid policy.
5. Milestones. The book that started jihad and Muslim radical fundamentalism, advocating violence against infidels and spreading faith by the sword.
Which one is the worst?
2007-02-11
17:42:00
·
23 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
The Koran and the Bible in themselves are not evil books: while they both contain things that to the modern mind are pure savagery, they also contained some good things in them, offsetting the bad.
People would have never used what Paul said about women to start drowning them, torturing them and burning them at the stake. The Malleus Maleficarum did that: if concentrated on the evil in the Bible and left out all the good.
Same with Milestones: you wouldn't have people dying and killing others to spread Islam if it were not for the beliefs provided in that book, the most likely to cause WW3.
2007-02-11
17:53:01 ·
update #1
The Talmud has been widely misquoted, and even so it lacks the obvious murderous results of the other books--unless you believe The Protocols are real.
Books like The Turner Diaries are just pap: easy to read, but not influential because they are pure emotion, with no brain.
On the other hand, the five books quoted above, not only dupe the foolish and uneducated, but also the leaders of nations and the intellectuals. That's why they are much more dangerous: because they are not stupid books of hate for hate's sake, but they give a philosophical, theological, racial or economic basis for hate.
2007-02-11
17:55:36 ·
update #2