English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How did Jefferson's policy toward the Indians contrast with the way Jackson had dealt with the Cherokee and other tribes in the Southeast? Jefferson's policy referring to treating the Indians with respect in hopes of making ties that might have been used to promote trade..?
I don't remember much of the way Jackson dealt with Indians, thanks to anyone who's willing to refresh my memory.

2007-02-11 16:49:19 · 4 answers · asked by huntingforeggs 2 in Education & Reference Homework Help

4 answers

Jackson's policies were quite opposite from Jefferson's. Jefferson told the Indians many things that would have been advantageous to their welfare and they tended to agree to go along with his plans. When Jackson actually dealt with the Indian's, he stole their homes and lands, ransacked their belongings. Made them walk from lush productive lands in Tennessee and Georgia to terribly poor land in Oklahoma. Hundreds of the people died along the way and of those that survived to get there , many died during the first winter without the proper shelter, clothes and blankets, or even food to survive the cold winter and harsh conditions. The march is commonly called the "Trail of Tears" . Check at www.kuiskui.com he is one of the last living Cherokee Chiefs, his site is very interesting and he will answer further questions for you

2007-02-11 17:15:05 · answer #1 · answered by Hattie O'Hara 2 · 0 0

Please examine this; it's going to make sense, and also you'll keep in mind no matter if it truly is on your very last exam: "Early in the nineteenth century, even as the instantly-growing to be usa stronger into the decrease South, white settlers confronted what they considered an impediment. This section become homestead to the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chicasaw and Seminole international locations. those Indian international locations, in the view of the settlers and many different white individuals, were status in the way of progression. keen for land to enhance cotton, the settlers forced the federal authorities to acquire Indian territory. Andrew Jackson, from Tennessee, turned right into a forceful proponent of Indian elimination. In 1814 he commanded the U.S. protection stress forces that defeated a faction of the Creek u . s .." So the reply, as you at present recognize, is "C". (once you ask for an answer, attempt to get a reference so that you could make sure if the reply is precise.)

2016-11-27 03:01:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As a Native American, I can tell you that Jackson was pretty much an American Hitler. Look up "The Trail of Tears."

2007-02-11 17:02:30 · answer #3 · answered by Lisa S 3 · 0 0

i THINK but not sure that jackson treated them really harsh by removing them from their territories and puttin them and telling them to get out of the way of the settlers who wanted to go west and explore the "unseen" land...i donno much detail sorry

2007-02-11 16:53:38 · answer #4 · answered by ThEpErSian 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers