Just a survey , please state your answer & nationality too.
Some friends of mine argue that answering will put you as the same level as the enemy as you thought they are inhuman.
On the other hands, some argue that if we refused to communicate, how would we expect any conciliation with our enemy
This question derived from Iranian president's letter to GWBush in May 2006.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad's_letter_to_George_W._Bush_(8_May_2006)
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0512-33.htm
2007-02-11 15:55:28 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, I would answer. Peace cannot be achieved without communication. Being arrogant and believing my enemy is "beneath" me is no reason to continue bad relations. You don't have to like a person (or country) to get along with them.
American
2007-02-11 16:01:34 · answer #1 · answered by Ashley 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush should have opened a dialog, if he had there is at least some chance we wouldn't be playing "who looks tougher" right now, and the odds of war wouldn't have increased. Bush is an idiot.
2007-02-11 16:09:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i would not answer a letter written by this nut case, he has said the Holocaust did not happen and he wants t o push Israel into the sea, he does not deserve a council with the President of the US.
2007-02-11 16:00:44 · answer #3 · answered by 007 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
How can one communicate with a terrorist on any level when all they care about is murder of innocent women a children?
2007-02-11 16:00:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
It is best not to communicate with a raving lunatic!
American
2007-02-11 16:04:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I would tell Ahmadinejad that if he doesn't shape up we are going to bomb him and his country back to the stone age.
2007-02-11 15:59:35 · answer #6 · answered by Jace 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
we don't negotiate with terrorist.
2007-02-11 19:22:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋